Keep in mind they are only faking the degree. They still have to be license. This is a separate thing and can't be faked. Without this, the person legally can't be a nurse.

I'm not saying training is bad. I just know how back logged nurse schools are and nursing degrees go way beyond medical like any other degree like I couldn't give a flying f if my nurse took art class or world religion. So it comes back down to. Can they do the job yes or no

Any case, it is likely in a number of years this won't be a problem with robotics

Can they do the job yes or no?

What was said in this report is there was 0 evidence of anyone that got bad treatment.

Anyways, I think in the future when we get humanoid robots we will be able to use them for basic medical. Maybe even make it where a robot or more advanced AI can remote in.

So here is the thing. There was a report on the news a week ago about how there was a ton of nurses that didn't go to school. They used a degree mill to make it look like they went to school.

Then during it, the people in charge of doing the national test (which you need to do in order to be license. There is no way around this but to be legit licensed) brag about how only about 30% of them passed the test and how this proves how hard it is to be a nurse.

​

But what that told me is the restrictions of having them go to school is too high as is and the system is built on pure BS.

You're looking at today. Look at flippy the robot. The one that cooks burgers. Also vending machines that make pizza and stuff.

It's likely all employees will be replaced at some point and then for security you would use security robots or a handful of people over a number of stores.

So I understand in some cases. Like you don't want the AI to help someone off themselves. But at the same time, is it the job of the company to censor it?

IMO as long as law doesn't force it. It shouldn't be censor

Likely if you were to replace 100,00 people. with the manager included you would need 5 people to keep up the system. The manager, 2 day shift, 2 night shift. And it is likely those 5 will actually cover a system that replaced half a million or more depending on distance and what not.

And even then their jobs will be replaced as it will be cheaper having robots installing, fixing, etc other robots and an AI control unit controlling it all.

>In any case, nothing you said negates my point about UBS.

I was just getting into the part where you're factually incorrect.

>I never said the jobs were replaced 1:1, nor that the same people working at McDonalds would get those jobs.

Then what was the point of the comment?

I was thinking of that exact thing. I can't remember if it showed him having other workers around him when he was working before the robots, but I'm sure it showed just him fixing things or maybe a much smaller team.

​

Anyone who says robots will make more jobs is saying screw all the other people.

>and it creates other jobs elsewhere around machine design, installation and upkeep

I hate it when people say this because just looking at the numbers shows this isn't an answer. Let's say you replaced 40 people (remember it is multiple shifts and so on).

There use to be network engineer jobs everywhere. There is no longer network engineer jobs hardly anywhere anymore. The reason is, after things are installed, you don't need to keep the person. So a lot of times today it is someone contracted among a large area.

The upkeep, unless if these things are breaking down every day. You have a small group over a large area that fixed this stuff up. And then what happen with computers is as the prices went down. Instead of hiring people to fix the parts. They are now replacing the entire computer and far less people are involved.

Like if you are replacing them 30 people and still have to keep even half for fixing and what not. This would make it more expensive because now you have down time and so on.

And then the design bit. Someone working at mc d likely doesn't have the background or ability to do design work. Did you know mc d is one of the biggest disability employers in the world? They even train their managers on this not to be nice. Sometimes they tell the managers this is the best the disabled person can get, and due to this they will stick around and jump through more crap because there is no other choice other than homeless or death. Litterally!!!

Anyways, even when you look at a normal person. Designing and so on now takes degrees in robotic or mechanical engineering. Meaning now the person has to magically over not have done a major degree, have the debt with that, and so on. And then even if they did. How many designers do you really need?

Oh and it is likely by then you can simply tell an AI your problem, your budget, and so on. And it will give you several designs, the software, and so on

Tldr the math doesn't add up to make your statement remotely true. Many people will be hurt by this

Now don't get me wrong. I 100% want this to happen. It more and more forces us to ubi and maybe a cashless society. But your statement wasn't factual

I think it has been obvious that is where things are going for a while.

Anyways, as far as the low wage workers. The problem is, none of that you can live off of. Like back in the 60s you could legit buy a house with a yearly salary of a waiter. It wasn't a great house, but it was possible. Today you have to work 3 or 4 jobs to just afford enough to live.

If we don't get ubi or the end of money after a given point it really will be the have and have not.

?

This post wasn't about a robot GF. It was about a robotic mechanic in your garage and in the shop.

I mean I 100% think what you are talking about will be a thing. They are already working on making sex dolls have motions and sounds like they breath, make sounds when things happen, and so on. And it has been pretty open that while most aren't open about it. One of the next big money makers will be a robotic wife/husband.

But the post has nothing to do with that.

Look up on YouTube blockchain explained for kids.

This should give you an understanding without the depth you most likely don't care about.

It was a dealership. I think it was they needed to change the water pump or something. Something we couldn't do or didn't have the tools to do it. We ended up taking it to another dealership.

But the odd thing is the first one the guy said he was too afraid to touch it to the point he didn't even look at the truck, he was cussing about the age, and so on. Another offer when he got off his vacation, but by that time we didn't trust the shop. Like it wasn't the first time we ran in problems with them. And the sad part is the manager said that's the best help they can get.

Anyways, I think none of these things will be a problem once humanoid robots take over such jobs. The stories of a mechanic "finding" problems which cost a fortune to fix and illegally holding a car while saying they can't let it go on the road, replacing parts with cheap parts when you brought high quality parts, and doing other shady or illegal things. All those problems will be in the past.

Even things like buying used cars will be less risky since you can bring the robot with you to look at cars.

>There are going to be rouge AIs, corrupt AIs, etc.

It's the same as rouge software, corrupt software, and so on.

Anyways, I think it is proper for us on here to talk about robot rights and other things. But the problem with making actual laws is unlike other tech. What is being made will massively change the world. And if it gets to the point many of us want. It's the first time humans created life in such a way that never has existed in the known universe.

What I was thinking is if it happens prior. Then humanoid robots can drive us and be hooked in our car sensors. This making it self driving.

But ya, I'm dealing with a truck that was built in 95. It needs working on, and because the age. Many shops that use to do work on it, they don't want to anymore. Looking around, there is reports of this even happening to something as old as 10 years old.

It will be interesting to see what happens. If they will try to protect jobs

>will I be screwed by the time I graduate?

Doubt it. But likely 5 years in your job if you get one, you might be.

>it seems more and more likely that all knowledge-based professions are at risk of being automated sooner rather than later.

Look at robots. Mix the 2, and it is most jobs.

:)

So I've been wanting to make a few apps for a LONG time. These aren't simple and requires AR. I've tried many times to make it, and I did try with Chat a month ago but no luck. Since it isn't built for coding I figure well, it was a nice try. Like I think it got me 90% there, but I have a ton of errors.

Anyways, hopefully this will make it possible.

I know what you're talking about. And you are right there is unknowns. But here is what we know.

1. Based on actual events (people messing up their brain with a fall, nail gun, or doctors cutting on the brain) you can forget things, act different, and even talk differently.
2. There has been cases where people hit there head (like dive in a pool that was too shallow) and while they lost a lot of abilities. With 0 training prior, they were a master of things like a piano.

You are talking about "you". Or more so the soul. But I'm talking about your hardware. Like we don't know enough and maybe it might make this impossible.

But lets assume I'm right and you could do most of this. Then in theory you could cure mental illnesses, change modern education to be more social and creative skills, and so on.

Your mind is where?

Your brain is physical. Like even if it was ptsd due to some memory. It could be possible to physically block or permanently erase that. Maybe even modify the memory.

> will Google show their real capability this time?

I think the bigger question is will they release it. Like they can show it all day long. But look at the Google grave yard. They are pretty famous for not letting things go to public and then out of no where killing it off.

Like I don't think they will kill it off. But IDK if they will bring it to the public.

>What inspired you to use AI for this?

The biggest reason why I used it was for a mix of flow and to make things more readable.

​

>Are you using it often for this sort of application? Any others?

What happen was the other day due to a family member passing away one of my ideas about nanobots being used to cure mental illness and problems in the brain. I was thinking about it, and it matured to basically what you're able to read in the link.

​

The other day I posted in a few places where I seen nanobots going, and many took it the wrong way. Like they hyper focused on curing mental illness and tried to link it to eugenics. To my guess it was the internet being the internet.

Anyways, I wanted to put the idea out in a better way to help inspire some to look into this and expand on it. Where nanobots could fix many of our problems. So I decided to use AI writers to help with the flow, logic, filling in spots, and so on.

​

Like one of the problems I have is I can tell you on a high level how giving things work like web 3 for example. But when I dumb it down or generalize things it becomes extremely hard to follow.

So to answer your question, it honestly depends how often I make a long and detail post. Like in the future I think 99.999% of users will heavily use AI writers to help get their idea across. But for the here and now, I'm not sure.

Prove me wrong. Seriously. I want you to spend your time getting the current tools we have to even get you to this level.

Put your money where your mouth is so to speak. Because you sure as shit don't know what you're talking about.