dc_dobbz

dc_dobbz t1_ix8r7lg wrote

If you feel you have to drive and you’re not going out much, what’s the benefit of being in DC? I haven’t mapped it but I I can’t imagine it would save any time.

3

dc_dobbz t1_itgg94k wrote

As others have said, states do build housing. The real question is “why don’t they build more of it (let alone enough)”. The short answer here is that any not-for-profit housing costs upwards of two or three times what it costs to build for-profit housing. That’s for a variety of factors but mostly because the developments are expected to lose money on the back end so all of the developers have to make their money up front.

And then you have to factor in the costs of on-going maintenance; which, as anyone who’s ever driven on RI roads can attest to, states are uniquely bad at doing.

5

dc_dobbz t1_itgf5qf wrote

I don’t know the specifics of this development, but “Affordable” in gov parlance typically is “income restricted” not below market rate. You have to make below a certain amount of money to get one of the affordable units, unusually through a lottery, and then you’re guaranteed the rate you pay will no more than 30% of your income

15