This response was 100% written by ChatGPT

I actually bought Google stock last week cause I think that was an overreaction to a small mistake. That's not what makes or breaks Google's position as a leader in AI development.

What did it originate from?

I agree there is some of that but if you try it out a bit you will see the jokes it tells are really not that great.

>This joke is funny because it plays with expectations. The setup of the joke establishes a situation where people from different faiths (a Christian, an atheist, and a Muslim) are coming together and enjoying a drink in harmony, which is unexpected and somewhat surprising. The punchline then takes this unexpected situation and adds another layer of surprise by highlighting the unexpected commonality between the three people (their love of beer).
>
>The joke also relies on wordplay, with the phrase "what a cold beer can do" being used in two different ways: first, in the literal sense of what a cold beer can do (quench thirst and refresh), and second, in the figurative sense of what a cold beer can do (bring people together and create harmony).
>
>Overall, this joke is funny because it relies on a combination of unexpected twists, wordplay, and the use of common cultural references (such as the idea of people from different faiths enjoying a drink together) to create a humorous effect.

I don't think we can really judge very well what they have in the pipeline without working there. Also speed isn't everything. If they are a bit slower but end up coming out with the absolute best chat AI, they will get their users right back.

Well, there is a difference between some advanced chat AI replacing the current google search and ChatGPT replacing it. I doubt Google will go down without a fight. If that's where search is heading, Google will 100% have their own chat AI and given their resources it will probably be among the best there is.

So why do you say "the technophobia is astounding" in another comment?

>I don't care if AI will make my field of work redundant.

I really really doubt this is true. You might think that now but when it actually happens, I think you will care. And if not then I guarantee you the vast majority of people will, which affects you too.

I'm literally from Germany, you seriously don't know much about Europe if you think this is a US-specific problem. The idea that millions of people become unemployed with almost no chance to be hired anywhere because their skillset has basically become obsolete scares the shit out of me. Redistribution of income will do very little to alleviate this because people want to be productive. They want to be valued.

I'd love to hear some explanations in the comments. I went with somewhat pessimistic as mix between absolutely terrified and somewhat optimistic. I think AIs will make our lives somewhat better in many areas and considerably better in a few areas. But it will also mean unemployment for millions of workers (e.g. truck drivers, taxi drivers, maybe also graphic designers...) which can become a huge problem, both economically and politically.