dignitytogether
dignitytogether OP t1_iso1d2g wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Why the defensiveness?
dignitytogether OP t1_iso162s wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Then my statement would also be true.
dignitytogether OP t1_iso11qm wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
I’m just following your logic.
dignitytogether OP t1_iso0z7n wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
You’re saying a law that protects women will make employers hire fewer women.
dignitytogether OP t1_iso0se8 wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
So you’re saying sexual harassment law has that effect then? Do you have data on that?
dignitytogether OP t1_iso0jb5 wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
So what’s your solution instead?
dignitytogether OP t1_iso084v wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
That’s already happening.
dignitytogether OP t1_ism5ngp wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Most people aren’t in a union. If you’d like to read about what’s happening, join the subreddit and read up about it.
dignitytogether OP t1_ism3xdq wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Sounds like a fear-based response. Take care.
dignitytogether OP t1_ism3ddj wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
That is included in the proposed legislation.
dignitytogether OP t1_ism33ne wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
No, that’s actually how anti-discrimination law started.
dignitytogether OP t1_ism1lwq wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
What if the abuse has a discriminatory impact, but you can’t prove discriminatory intent that the courts now call for?
dignitytogether OP t1_ism103a wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
They both involve abusive mistreatment of employees.
dignitytogether OP t1_islzvpt wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
That’s illogical
dignitytogether OP t1_islzdk4 wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
So with that logic, you don’t support anti-discrimination law?
dignitytogether OP t1_islvu7p wrote
Reply to comment by PuritanSettler1620 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Tell that to a therapist.
dignitytogether OP t1_islcymd wrote
Reply to THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Employers are not explicitly liable for the psychological harm of their employees, nor do they want to be. Employers choose to avoid a perceived threat of liability over human well-being.
Sign up for a Saturday, October 22 Lives Lost to Workplace Bullying and Mobbing protest in your area or start one:
https://actionnetwork.org/events/lives-lost-to-workplace-bullying-and-mobbing/
Sign the petition to pass the Workplace Psychological Safety Act:
https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/pass-the-workplace-psychological-safety-act/
dignitytogether OP t1_iqwfdu8 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Lives lost to workplace bullying and mobbing by dignitytogether
Good point about the rest of the people. Thank you.
We don't have any evidence there were other issues leading up to his breaking point, though. That's a myth that there must be preexisting issues when abuse leads to suicide.
dignitytogether OP t1_iqwd7v4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Lives lost to workplace bullying and mobbing by dignitytogether
The point is the damage abuse at work does, especially when employers do nothing.
dignitytogether OP t1_iqvr540 wrote
Employers are not explicitly liable for the psychological harm of their employees, nor do they want to be. Employers choose to avoid a perceived threat of liability over human well-being.
Sign up for a Saturday, October 22 Lives Lost to Workplace Bullying and Mobbing protest in your area or start one:
https://actionnetwork.org/events/lives-lost-to-workplace-bullying-and-mobbing/
Sign the petition to pass the Workplace Psychological Safety Act:
https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/pass-the-workplace-psychological-safety-act/
dignitytogether OP t1_iso1oq2 wrote
Reply to comment by One-Coast8927 in THIS SATURDAY! We're speaking out against abuse at work across the nation to call for change by dignitytogether
Sexual harassment is also words.