You're absolutely correct.
However the problem with that analogy is that you're assuming that if you're not a master you've failed. Which I don't believe is the case.
Even if you're not a master after 10,000 hours, you're still going to be really good.
drumintercourse t1_isr6lr4 wrote
Reply to comment by megagngn in [image] Failure by ShibaHook
You're absolutely correct. However the problem with that analogy is that you're assuming that if you're not a master you've failed. Which I don't believe is the case.
Even if you're not a master after 10,000 hours, you're still going to be really good.