Because billionaires like to offset their income with a loss while getting all the benefits of owning a sports team.

Saying the word also moves the sound from the back of your mouth to the front.

I want a hot dog! Me too….let me get back to you.

Yes they do you just need a prescription

So if you’re in a bad relationship keep trying forever and keep failing forever and don’t ever walk away and find someone that makes you happy? That’s dumb bro.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States

If one is intersex it isn’t opposite.

Reminds me of baseball stats: first Puerto Rican to hit a grand slam on a Tuesday after the all star break!

TIL water floats and totally doesn’t have anything under it.

The obvious answer

Two boobies and a cockatoo

If you have to pee bad you’re Russian to get there.

Nah but a want a regular banana later so yeah

Your income would be about $35000-50000 a year in that case. If you can live off of that then you’re set.

To give a serious answer to your question they might have been to areas like Western Sahara which is disputed. Or gone to South Sudan before it was independent and doesn’t know whether to count it. These are two examples. I have been to Aruba which isn’t a country but it’s administered by the Netherlands but I haven’t been to the Netherlands so that’s kind of the same.

Chris was way older.

The extra game they had that they wouldn’t have had in the 16 game format was not the opponent they played in week 18. More teams in contention and fewer byes make more teams play up until the end.

Nope. The added 17th game wasn’t the week 18 game. An extra game and an extra slot absolutely changes the dynamic. More teams are playing harder right up until the end.

I can see that. Doesn’t change the fact that adding an extra game with an opponent you wouldn’t have otherwise played could have ended differently especially when the lions had the tiebreaker. Plus giving one bye instead of two means more teams are playing up until the end of the season. It absolutely has a much higher chance of happening with 7 per side.

You can’t discount it. You simply can’t. Especially since it literally never happened before.

Nah. There’s a real chance that two byes and six slots would have changed how things turned out.

Maybe. The motivations would have been different and there would have been one less game. Some teams would have not played their starters because the first two teams used to get a bye. We can’t know one way or the other. But again, still worth noting that it never happened with 16 games and a 12 team playoff.

Worth noting that it never happened after realignment in 2002 with a 12 team playoff format. Only happened because they added another team to each conference’s playoffs.

I’d love to take this advice but I wouldn’t want to expect anything from you.

Shows you how much a billion is huh?