Does it execute the trades or just pick?

This is funny and makes sense. AI will maybe be a perfect solution for people who are only comfortable with new representations of things they're already totally familiar with. Ie a 'new Picasso'

Could you elaborate on DnD campaigns? How do you use it? Like to do the idea for the campaign, or the progress, or what?

Well, it's a result based on that lieu, anyway. Which is part of one of the concerns of 'replacing' scholarly workers. That without a continuing body of reliable data, AI will not be able to progress.

I've used it for some similar types of questions. It's good at finding more or less something applicable to what I'm looking for (in legal questions, history, etc). But it seems it's just grabbing what I could find otherwise on Wikipedia and research papers, and making it so I don't have to read through everything to find it. And for giving colored responses that we can interpret. I haven't really been impressed by anything it's said though, the way I am when I listen to a real expert in the subject, and rather it's just good at presenting encyclopedic/textbook info. Have you?

Do you mark this down to the low quality of that worker? or would it be that even good producers would be less competent than ChatGPT?

I've used it for routine, boring tasks as well, and it is good at generating large amounts of things for simple requirements, as long as you edit it afterwards. I've also used it for some summaries/things like this, and it's OK not great.

But that's sort of the most capability I've seen it have.