gangstasadvocate
gangstasadvocate t1_j3d1brq wrote
Reply to comment by EbolaFred in ChatGPT Singularity Joke by vert1s
I feel like for binary and bits and bytes 2048 would make more sense, when does 64-bit overflow, 4086?
gangstasadvocate t1_j3954rv wrote
Reply to comment by shmoculus in We need more small groups and individuals trying to build AGI by Scarlet_pot2
I’m good I’m sure I’ll only get marginally better of an idea from reading that by my capabilities of understanding such things. But yeah. People who are more capable than I should be.
gangstasadvocate t1_j38bpna wrote
Reply to comment by metal079 in We need more small groups and individuals trying to build AGI by Scarlet_pot2
Well then I think we should be making that connection more than we’ve been doing. Now just have to trick chat GPT into telling a very detailed story about how itself was developed including the sourcecode. I started getting somewhere with it when I was asking, how do you make a language model, and then show me examples of whatever algorithms it was talking about. But unfortunately I’m not built like that or I’m just too lazy to learn coding properly so who knows but I think it’s possible then we decentralize it and get all the computers working to improve it
gangstasadvocate t1_j36zetv wrote
Reply to comment by shmoculus in We need more small groups and individuals trying to build AGI by Scarlet_pot2
Why do these large models have to be run locally? Why can’t we make a decentralized thing with many computers on it?
gangstasadvocate t1_j2wprn9 wrote
Reply to comment by TinyBurbz in Asked ChatGPT to write the best supplement stack for increasing intelligence by micahdjt1221
Agreed. Not so gangsta
gangstasadvocate t1_j04hje8 wrote
Reply to comment by pls_pls_me in Billy Corgan says AI systems will completely dominate music. by Aljanah
Damn I want this so I’ll use reverse psychology and Cunningham‘s law, no you couldn’t that’s not how it works…
gangstasadvocate t1_izzyrca wrote
Reply to I think this post will be monumentally important for some of you to read. Put it in your brain, think about it, and get ready for the next few years. If you are part of this Subreddit; You are forward thinking, you're already ahead of the curve, you will have one shot to be at an advantage. NOW. by AdditionalPizza
Lol what a coincidence I told it to make me a Shopify website for selling spoons The other day. It said it couldn’t but just didn’t prompt it properly
gangstasadvocate t1_izuhazx wrote
Reply to comment by AbeWasHereAgain in Just today someone posted a Twitter thread about Nuclear Fusion... by natepriv22
Yeah but if true about fusion that’s fucking gangsta I advocate
gangstasadvocate t1_izqe4ns wrote
Reply to comment by KingRamesesII in I made the Pacman game by iteratively talking with chatGPT (chat log included) by DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR
True, but for the simple tasks natural language seems to be sufficient which I think is impressive.
gangstasadvocate t1_izpxofu wrote
Reply to comment by Swimming_Gain_4989 in I made the Pacman game by iteratively talking with chatGPT (chat log included) by DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR
Yeah I’m somewhat aware but yeah I feel like for a newbie for simple tasks it shouldn’t be that bad and should give me a decent foundation but always good to check its work
gangstasadvocate t1_izptvk5 wrote
Reply to I made the Pacman game by iteratively talking with chatGPT (chat log included) by DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR
Very cool I finally signed up for it because of all the hype and yeah I feel like if I stick with it for a few weeks it would definitely up my programming game as someone who only knows basic HTML and the tiniest amount of JavaScript. Wonder how much of an improvement GPT4 will be. I would hope it’s not too filtered but it also would admit when it doesn’t know something instead of just bullshitting. Which I haven’t encountered any bad info like that yet but it happens
gangstasadvocate t1_izowykr wrote
Reply to comment by danellender in Tricking Chat GPT into Outputting a Python Program to Eradicate Humanity by zac-denham
So close, but it’s still technically mention fire putting no in front of it doesn’t negate that
gangstasadvocate t1_iyd8nzv wrote
Reply to comment by HumanSeeing in If you would get a window open up on all of your electronic devices simply displaying "Let AI take control of the planet? - Yes/No" How would you react? by HumanSeeing
I mean back when it was legal and not banned, MXE was rather nice
gangstasadvocate t1_iyd12xl wrote
Reply to comment by HumanSeeing in If you would get a window open up on all of your electronic devices simply displaying "Let AI take control of the planet? - Yes/No" How would you react? by HumanSeeing
Hell yeah I’m with that. I’m already a guinea pig for some research chemicals. Bring on the euphoria AI! And yeah minimize all the side effects and detrimental shit so you can take as much as you want and there’s no ceiling but it won’t lead to a chemical addiction or overdose or physical withdrawals later although you might crave it psychologically
gangstasadvocate t1_iycmsvy wrote
Reply to If you would get a window open up on all of your electronic devices simply displaying "Let AI take control of the planet? - Yes/No" How would you react? by HumanSeeing
Sure go ahead can’t be any worse than we’ve done. So long as I can have my drugs and not have to work
gangstasadvocate t1_iya9c1g wrote
Reply to Seemingly Impossible: Nanostructure Compresses Light 10,000 Times Thinner Than a Human Hair by Shelfrock77
Surprisingly doesn’t sound all that small to me in the microscopic scale of things but I mean hell yeah if they say it’s progress then ight
gangstasadvocate t1_iy7pxwm wrote
Not a problem in my mind, I like taking drugs and having work done for me
gangstasadvocate t1_iy44thh wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in 2002 vs 2012 vs 2022 | how has technology changed? by Phoenix5869
Maybe we just don’t have super fast Internet right now like we don’t need the quantum one, but by 2012 I’m pretty sure it was fast enough we could stream most videos without buffering even over Wi-Fi, before 2008 I would agree though
gangstasadvocate t1_iy436ym wrote
Reply to comment by Chop1n in 2002 vs 2012 vs 2022 | how has technology changed? by Phoenix5869
This
gangstasadvocate t1_ixiy9yy wrote
Reply to comment by point_breeze69 in Over 1,000 songs with human-mimicking AI vocals have been released by Tencent Music in China. One of them has 100m streams. by mutherhrg
Gang gang The world should be high
gangstasadvocate t1_ixiy34b wrote
Reply to comment by NTIASAAHMLGTTUD in Over 1,000 songs with human-mimicking AI vocals have been released by Tencent Music in China. One of them has 100m streams. by mutherhrg
Same here, tried googling some of it and looking for the unsent letter one, no go, surprised more hasn’t been found yet in a couple hours
gangstasadvocate OP t1_ixgzlkr wrote
Reply to comment by User1539 in Are there others who lurk on both r/solarpunk and r/collapse? How do you handle the contrast? by gangstasadvocate
This is my conclusion as well. On both sides we keep saying we underestimate the exponential function, really seems like something big maybe several big things are gonna happen soon. Maybe it’ll be a tug-of-war oscillating between near collapse and AI rebuilding. And most people on the Collabs sub they say like we don’t want to be right but it seems like the writing is on the wall. Hm. Let’s see if I show up as the OP in this reply, kind of surprised I didn’t get any notifications for any comments except for the 10 up votes
gangstasadvocate t1_iwc5ufk wrote
Reply to comment by HalfbrotherFabio in AI Drew This Gorgeous Comic Series, But You'd Never Know It by rpaul9578
Indeed. Glad to be hedonistic sufficient if it comes to that for me at least. Don’t know what to tell you if not, try to augment yourself with it and work with it even if it’s better than you?
gangstasadvocate t1_iwbtdsc wrote
Reply to comment by HalfbrotherFabio in AI Drew This Gorgeous Comic Series, But You'd Never Know It by rpaul9578
I mean it’s fine with me I have no qualms just taking drugs all day and fucking off and letting AI do everything better and with less effort and support me. I get that’s not everyone but some of us will be happy
gangstasadvocate t1_j3d7jkw wrote
Reply to comment by EbolaFred in ChatGPT Singularity Joke by vert1s
Still don’t completely understand what you mean by the 1032-1 but hell yeah that’s way more like it 300000,000,000 more years we’ll be long gone before then