ganjamozart
ganjamozart t1_j153ak5 wrote
Reply to comment by vestigule in Anarchism at the End of the World: A defence of the instinct that won’t go away by Sventipluk
I mean looking at the state of the world, I find that claim highly dubious. Even looking at global pew research poll results on things like climate change and so on, critical thinking is hardly as common as you purport it to be.
ganjamozart t1_j14inje wrote
Reply to comment by vestigule in Anarchism at the End of the World: A defence of the instinct that won’t go away by Sventipluk
I am astonished by your comment. Most people are indoctrinated by society and institutions to not question authority. Most people just get on with life with the mindset that 'this is the way the world is meant to be'.
Even take something like the family unit. Some cultures enforce absolute obedience and eliminate all capacity for critical thought.
ganjamozart t1_j10fhbj wrote
Reply to comment by Intellectuallygifted in Anarchism at the End of the World: A defence of the instinct that won’t go away by Sventipluk
This, Chomsky often sums it up as authority needs to justify itself, otherwise it should be dismantled.
ganjamozart t1_issi3a6 wrote
Reply to comment by Nosnmad in The benefits of doing nothing | An overactive 'life drive' endlessly seeks expansion, inevitably leads to burnout, and drains us of the energy needed to truly progress. Finding the time to do nothing is essential to reassessing who we are and who we want to be. by IAI_Admin
The definition of a mindlessly 'productive' existence.
ganjamozart t1_isp13n4 wrote
Reply to The benefits of doing nothing | An overactive 'life drive' endlessly seeks expansion, inevitably leads to burnout, and drains us of the energy needed to truly progress. Finding the time to do nothing is essential to reassessing who we are and who we want to be. by IAI_Admin
Byung Chul Han's auto-exploitation comes to mind and his concept of the burnout society.
ganjamozart t1_jcoesmg wrote
Reply to comment by IAI_Admin in Schopenhauer and Hegel’s feud was metaphysical: a pessimist who recognised the unchangeable essence of the world and an optimist who saw human history as perpetual growth could never get along. by IAI_Admin
Pinker is Hegelian 😂 😂 😂