goatAlmighty

goatAlmighty t1_jcks27q wrote

I'm 51, so I'm oldstyle, therefore I would suggest looking for radio stations that play the type of music you like, if you want to find more of the same kind.

If you really want to expand beyond the genre(s) you currently listen to, another thing could be to look for "best of"-lists in different genres, to see if there's something in there you like.

1

goatAlmighty t1_jb67pdn wrote

What you describe is the big elephant in the room nobody of these fools want to address. If we take their own rules and use them on everything then we could make an arguments like:

  • No non-european human being is allowed to play classical music from a few hundred years ago because it was invented there, not in Africa, not in Asia, not on the American continent.

  • Should people not originating from a certain continent be prohibited to wear clothes that were invented on another continent? What about the usage of computers, which weren't invented in Africa but in Europa and the USA, basically?

14

goatAlmighty t1_jaeg6in wrote

I read that it happened at home, but that doesn't make anything better, imho. For something important like that, there should be a dedicated machine that is used for nothing else.

And if the employee really used the same password twice, given the company they work for, that would be unbelievably stupid.

11

goatAlmighty t1_jaeatkt wrote

I would strongly disagree. And it sounds to me as if you have not much knowledge about what they actually did. As others here have pointed out, they were very much on the front when it came to experimenting with new technologies and different ways to create sound. And even if there were other bands (of course there were others), most of them do not come even close to the impact the Beatles had.

None of us who didn't live in that time can fully grasp how important the Beatles were. Their songs not being "all that interesting" is a viewpoint under todays' standards where just about everything has been done before. A few things of what the Beatles did had simply never been done before.

6

goatAlmighty t1_ja6wgcu wrote

Because people think, just because the have an audience of potentially millions, that alone makes their opinion in any way relevant. They mix up reach with relevancy, so to say.

Btw, at the same time you have to accept that everybody has different tastes, and therefore, there certainly will be people who don't like Gal Gadot. Which is perfectly fine, as long as they don't expect that everybody else dislikes her, just because they do. And it goes the other way round as well. ;-)

2

goatAlmighty t1_ja2e78h wrote

Oh, of course! Thanks for the correction! I mixed up the title with one of the songs, as "The Show must go on" was so prominent back then. I also didn't know exactly which songs on "made in heaven" were "new" and which were older stuff, though I assumed that they chose "I was born to love you" for example was chosen because he could not sing enough songs.

2

goatAlmighty t1_ja0cyur wrote

Thanks for the clarification. Very interesting. I didn't know that many details about it. I really should check if there is some kind of official biography available. Though I guess many of these juicy details would be left out intentionally. :-)

Edit: "The Chain" is one of the many songs from them I really like.

3

goatAlmighty t1_ja0428q wrote

That sounds a bit like one of the Albums by Black Sabbath I read about where they had their own dealer to bring them all kinds of drugs each day. Plus more groopies than they could handle, apparently. :-D

Due to some accident the police went by one day, and they panicked and flushed all the stuff down the toilet, only to notice that the police hadn't come for them. One bandmember said that they flushed away drugs worth several thousand dollars in a few minutes.

3

goatAlmighty t1_j9zwd13 wrote

One mustn't forget "Made in heaven" by Queen. Freddy Mercurys health had deteriorated already with the former album "The show must go on", but with Heaven he was rather close to death. I guess one could say that he worked like a maniac and gave his last breath for his fans. That he still was able to give us so many great songs is both breathtaking and heartbreaking.

If I remember correctly, it took the rest of the band one or two years until they were able to work on the album and release it, due to the loss of their lifelong friend.

Edit: There are some incorrect infos on my part, so be sure to check the following message. My bad, sorry.

5

goatAlmighty t1_j9zebyc wrote

Fleetwood Macs' "Rumours".

As far as I know, there were several broken (or breaking?) relationships in the band around that time, and that turmoil went into a few of the songs. Like "Go your own way", written by Lindsey Buckingham over his broken relationship with Stevie Nicks. Or "Don't stop" written by Christine McVie, concerning her separation from her former husband John McVie. At least that is how I remember it.

16

goatAlmighty t1_j9xr6xy wrote

I think I would make a horror story out of it, like, that this happened in a society where each and every physical altercation is strongly forbidden and results in capital punishment. And it is to be executed as soon as Smith has left the venue and everyone around him including himself, knows that.

Edit: I mean, I kinda like the OPs' idea, but the stakes in that scenario aren't high enough for me to make it truly interesting.

1