hellomondays

hellomondays t1_iyeopoa wrote

Also see the National Research Council (2014)'s report on the growth of incarceration in the US:

>Nevertheless, the evidence base demonstrates that lengthy prison sentences are ineffective as a crime control measure. Specifically, the incremental deterrent effect of increases in lengthy prison sentences is modest at best. Also, because recidivism rates decline markedly with age and prisoners necessarily age as they serve their prison sentence, lengthy prison sentences are an inefficient approach to preventing crime by incapacitation unless they are specifically targeted at very high-rate or extremely dangerous offenders. For these reasons, statutes mandating lengthy prison sentences cannot be justified on the basis of their effectiveness in preventing crime.

2

hellomondays t1_iy59yoc wrote

Arvo Part's Fur Alina stills sounds like something new to me. Like I finally understood those friars and priest who lock themselves away for years to obsess over a few pages of holy texts. There's something very deep and mysterious about that piece, it leaves you feeling curious. It's also one of the most difficult piano pieces you can learn because of that. here's a good video of the score lined up with someone performing to that might explain what I mean.

4

hellomondays t1_ixil330 wrote

Eh more severe punishments don't lead to less recidivism in the first place; locking people up for longer actually appears to increase their chances of recidivism slightly. Second of all, parole is going to be handled by the Parole board, not the DA's office. Third of all when it comes to what charges they negotiated, no DA office in the country is going to pull a lot of resources into a low profile AA and arson charges, even in wealthy counties they're overworked and will hope for a plea deal. You can blame city hall and the state for underfunding the criminal justice system.

−16