ihateshadylandlords
ihateshadylandlords t1_iy3ei7q wrote
Reply to comment by Talkat in 2002 vs 2012 vs 2022 | how has technology changed? by Phoenix5869
I hope those things are all in production and available for the masses by then.
!RemindMe 17 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_iy1d9jj wrote
I was a middle schooler in 2002, and it was pretty different. I remember collect calls since cell phones were just starting to proliferate with my classmates. VR aka Virtual Boy had flopped a couple of years earlier. DVDs will still a thing, and so was Blockbuster.
I remember my dad had to use map quest to take me to baseball games and I was listeneinf to music on my CD player while he was cussing because he missed his exit. Porn wasn’t free and you had to rely on playboy mags or wait a while for a single pic to download.
What’s funny is that 2012 to me was drastically different than 2002. But 2012 doesn’t really feel different than 2022. I mean I have an air fryer now, but I can’t really think of much that’s changed from then to now.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iy0pzce wrote
It’s no surprise they’re trying to make their own version of co-pilot.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iy0o3j4 wrote
Reply to Genetically modified tobacco plant makes cocaine. Some people use it as coffee alternative others for pain reduction meds. by epSos-DE
Hold on to your papers fellas!
ihateshadylandlords t1_ixwuo0m wrote
Reply to For anyone still believing that standalone VR/AR/MR will flourish and popularize in the 2020s, please watch this video and think again. by Quealdlor
Bro, at least give a one sentence summary if you’re gonna post your YouTube videos. I’m all for giving you the clicks, but you have to give me something to work with.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ixnkwyl wrote
“Patients who were on the course of treatment survived for 19.3 months compared to 16.5 months for the control group.
The long tail is more interesting where 13 percent of those treated survived for five years, while only 5.7 percent of the control group did. 331 patients were enrolled in the trial.
According to the results, there is still a long way to go.”
I’m stoked to see treatments make it into the clinical trials stage. Not that proof of concepts are meaningless, but there’s a gulf between proof of concept and the rubber meets the road stage of clinical trials. Hope this goes well!
ihateshadylandlords t1_ixjxaij wrote
Reply to GPT3 is powerful but blind. The future of Foundation Models will be embodied agents that proactively take actions, endlessly explore the world, and continuously self-improve. What does it take? In our NeurIPS Outstanding Paper “MineDojo”, we provide a blueprint for this future by Dr_Singularity
Yeah, GPT3 is stuck in time. Hopefully newer models can continually improve and have better memory.
!RemindMe 5 years.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ixijnuy wrote
Reply to Human Trial to Regrow Mini-Livers in Patients with End-Stage Liver Damage by lunchboxultimate01
Glad to see treatments like this go into clinical trials. It’s one thing to have proof of concept. It’s a completely different ballgame to even make it to the clinical trials stage. Hope everything goes well.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ixfw21b wrote
Reply to 3D for everyone? Nvidia’s Magic3D can generate 3D models from text - New AI aims to democratize 3D content creation, no modeling skills required. by AGIAISA
Is there a link where we can use it? I couldn’t find anything in that website or Google.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix53y1t wrote
Reply to comment by Milumet in New CRISPR cancer treatment tested in humans for first time by Phoenix5869
> A month after treatment, five of the patients’ tumors were the same size as before, suggesting that the engineered cells may have had a stabilizing effect on their condition.
> The cancer continued to progress in the other 11 patients, but the patient given the highest dose of cells saw a short term improvement in their cancer — that could mean the treatment would be more effective in future studies if administered in higher doses.
> “We just need to hit it stronger the next time,” said Ribas.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix4o6gx wrote
Glad to see a rubber meets the road post. Hopefully we have more CRISPR trials as the years go on.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix0ikmc wrote
Reply to comment by ChromeGhost in 2023 predictions by ryusan8989
I don’t think those new VR headsets will impact the average person, but that’s just me.
ihateshadylandlords t1_ix0fjye wrote
Reply to 2023 predictions by ryusan8989
So I don’t think much will change from 2022 to 2023, but I think a ton will change over the next two decades. I think 2023 will be like 2022 for the average person. We on /r/singularity might see more game changing developments in the lab, but still won’t be available for the average Joe.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwxxq7r wrote
Reply to The time it took to get to the moon. by Redvolition
So how much further have we gone since the moon landing?
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwvcwoo wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
If it bothers you so much, then use the block feature. It really is that simple.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwv8gi4 wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
If you’re upset about me making reminders, that’s on you.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwuvans wrote
Reply to MIT solved a century-old differential equation to break 'liquid' AI's computational bottleneck by Rakshear
Let’s see where this goes.
!RemindMe 5 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwnnbqd wrote
Reply to comment by userbrn1 in Decoding fMRI based brain activities and reconstructing images with accurate semantics and image features using diffusion model by MysteryInc152
Thank you so much for that breakdown
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwjh7dr wrote
Reply to Cerebras Builds Its Own (1 Exaflop) AI Supercomputer - Andromeda - in just 3 days by Dr_Singularity
So what are the implications of this? From what I could tell from the article, it looks like it trains LLMs faster.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwjfm24 wrote
Reply to MIT researchers solved the differential equation behind the interaction of two neurons through synapses to unlock a new type of fast and efficient artificial intelligence algorithms by Dr_Singularity
>”The new machine-learning models we call 'CfC's' replace the differential equation defining the computation of the neuron with a closed form approximation, preserving the beautiful properties of liquid networks without the need for numerical integration," says MIT Professor Daniela Rus, director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) and senior author on the new paper. "CfC models are causal, compact, explainable, and efficient to train and predict. They open the way to trustworthy machine learning for safety-critical applications."
Cool, excited to see what comes after this.
!RemindMe 3 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwik56v wrote
Nice. I’m excited to see how this plays out over the next decade.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwh8w7z wrote
Reply to comment by z0rm in My predictions for the next 30 years by z0rm
I don’t think it’s made it into production yet. Here’s a list of the fastest supercomputers as of June 2022: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/06/fastest-supercomputers-frontier-exascale/
ihateshadylandlords t1_iwh691i wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in 64 Exaflop supercomputer being built and will be operational by the end of 2022 according to forbes by Phoenix5869
Yep, there’s a lot of fluff when it comes to tech/AI unfortunately.
ihateshadylandlords t1_iy50iho wrote
Reply to AI invents millions of materials that don’t yet exist. "Transformative tool" is already being used in the hunt for more energy-dense electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. by SoulGuardian55
I wonder how many are feasible to make. What’s the saying about Graphene, it can do everything but make it out of the lab? Hope this leads to great things being available for the masses.
!RemindMe 10 years.