lovesdogsguy
lovesdogsguy t1_iwxzoaw wrote
Reply to comment by r0cket-b0i in The time it took to get to the moon. by Redvolition
It’s looking like 5 to me.
lovesdogsguy t1_iwnybtf wrote
Reply to comment by agorathird in Cerebras Builds Its Own (1 Exaflop) AI Supercomputer - Andromeda - in just 3 days by Dr_Singularity
lol
lovesdogsguy t1_iwnlavk wrote
Reply to comment by agorathird in Cerebras Builds Its Own (1 Exaflop) AI Supercomputer - Andromeda - in just 3 days by Dr_Singularity
Where am I??
lovesdogsguy t1_iuhbpdy wrote
lovesdogsguy t1_iucxrzy wrote
Reply to comment by Sashinii in Experts: 90% of Online Content Will Be AI-Generated by 2026 by PrivateLudo
Agreed. I thought it was a mistake to push the avatar sequel release dates back again. 2026 for Avatar 4 and 2028 for Avatar 5 seems risky. I'm sure people will still be partaking in traditional media, but maybe they won't?
lovesdogsguy t1_iu48gua wrote
Reply to comment by RavenWolf1 in The Great People Shortage is coming — and it's going to cause global economic chaos | Researchers predict that the world's population will decline in the next 40 years due to declining birth rates — and it will cause a massive shortage of workers. by Shelfrock77
Agreed!
lovesdogsguy t1_itztuik wrote
Reply to comment by RavenWolf1 in The Great People Shortage is coming — and it's going to cause global economic chaos | Researchers predict that the world's population will decline in the next 40 years due to declining birth rates — and it will cause a massive shortage of workers. by Shelfrock77
A lot of these articles really don't need to be posted here. That title is just silly.
lovesdogsguy t1_islebkb wrote
>In their paper, researchers from Oxford University and Australian National University explain a fundamental pain point in the design of AI: “Given a few assumptions, we argue that it will encounter a fundamental ambiguity in the data about its goal. For example, if we provide a large reward to indicate that something about the world is satisfactory to us, it may hypothesize that what satisfied us was the sending of the reward itself; no observation can refute that.”
​
This isn't news. Ffs, this has long been a known issue with AI, and it's purely theoretical.
​
Edit: To quote the fourth (at time of writing) most upvoted comment in the futurology sub:
​
>Gotta love a headline with a vague appeal to authority, especially when it's opinion based. I'm guessing there are plenty of other "Researchers" with a different opinion, but those people don't get the headlines because their opinions aren't stoking fear to generate clicks
​
Some common sense over there for once.
lovesdogsguy t1_ir71yni wrote
Reply to comment by Quealdlor in "The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months." by Smoke-away
Oh yes, that's correct according to this. I think I was actually thinking more about the new advances in text-to-video generation, which combined with all the other news this year, I find pretty astonishing.
lovesdogsguy t1_ir6qnhy wrote
Reply to "The number of AI papers on arXiv per month grows exponentially with doubling rate of 24 months." by Smoke-away
So many advances pouring in every week / day now. I wonder what we'll have by the end of 2022?
2023 is going to produce the equivalent of years of progress at the current rate, maybe more.
lovesdogsguy t1_ix0ibvl wrote
Reply to 'Crass' and an 'insult'. FIFA president criticized for speech on Qatar's human rights ahead of World Cup by ladyem8
I genuinely think Twitter is throttling search results for things like fan “accommodations.” I’ve been searching repeatedly but there are almost no pictures being posted from arriving fans, just the same few attainted by the likes of the telegraph etc. The selfies should be FLOODING in by now for an event as big as this.