maskedpaki
maskedpaki t1_j941kv3 wrote
Reply to comment by adt in Update on Deepmind’s Gato? by Sharp_Soup_2353
in the middle of doing that but havent heard a thing in 8 months.
​
are they purposely hiding it because its worth money?
maskedpaki t1_j8g2v6v wrote
Reply to comment by gay_manta_ray in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
no actually seems like a pretty narrow science benchmark
​
if you told me the MMLU 0 shot was higher than 175 billion gpt 3.5 with under a billion parameters then id be absolutely shocked
maskedpaki t1_j8c0eso wrote
Reply to comment by d00m_sayer in This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
I've seen so many things like this that actually end up surpassing gpt3 on some narrow benchmark with more optimised prompting rather than just being a better model overall
I hope I'm wrong this time
maskedpaki t1_j8by3r7 wrote
Reply to This is Revolutionary?! Amazon's 738 Million(!!!) parameter's model outpreforms humans on sience, vision, language and much more tasks. by Ok_Criticism_1414
This is like 2 weeks old. If it really does surpass gpt3 with under a billion parameters then why isn't this on headlines.
maskedpaki t1_j853khi wrote
Reply to Where are all the multi-modal models? by ReadSeparate
chatgpt will grow into a multimodal model im guessing. they are updating every couple of weeks and are charging real money now for plus. Its going to take off really quick.
maskedpaki t1_j7u98qj wrote
Reply to I asked Microsoft's 'new Bing' to write me a cover letter for a job. It refused, saying this would be 'unethical' and 'unfair to other applicants.' by TopHatSasquatch
Eventually there will be a call in centre for chatgpt once it makes billions where a human can override the ais refusal to do x if X is actually a reasonable request.
maskedpaki t1_j7nkucz wrote
Reply to AI Progress of February Week 1 (1-7 Feb) by Pro_RazE
They weren't lying about 2023 lol
maskedpaki t1_j7k2jug wrote
Reply to comment by Oscarcharliezulu in 200k!!!!!! by Key_Asparagus_919
by next tuesday since growth is exponential
maskedpaki t1_j6owh7z wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ChatGPT Content Detector Launched By Stanford University by vadhavaniyafaijan
Good thing no one gives a fuck about poetry
maskedpaki t1_j6hq48c wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
Maybe not decades out but there were computers that played go several years prior to alphago with lower elo rating
In fact alphagos elo rating is continuous with previous systems that played go. It wasn't a breakthrough. Just a flashy display because it was against superstar Lee sedol.
maskedpaki t1_j6hmvzz wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
Or 10 to 100 times slower.
The future is hard to predict. The past predictions mostly failed because they were too aggressive not because they were too conservative most of the time
This is a small exception
maskedpaki t1_j6g92bp wrote
Reply to comment by Villad_rock in New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
If I say by 2050 is that also laughable ?
maskedpaki t1_j6g8xg1 wrote
Reply to New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
20 years is on the same order of magnitude as 100
It's not that ridiculous
maskedpaki t1_j6f0kfo wrote
Reply to comment by lovesdogsguy in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
Holy shit I missed the start and then didn't realise it was chatgpt until seeing a reply. It makes me realise how good chatgpt is at making text. It's pretty much perfect for short passages.
maskedpaki t1_j610qmx wrote
Reply to comment by Erophysia in Member of Congress Reads an AI-Generated Speech on US House Floor by maxtility
They could use it today. The man just chose not to. So it could be anywhere from 0 years till the heat death
maskedpaki t1_j6109gl wrote
Reply to comment by Erophysia in Member of Congress Reads an AI-Generated Speech on US House Floor by maxtility
Text to voice was demoed by Steve Jobs in 1984. We've had the tech for a long time
maskedpaki t1_j5ydg6t wrote
Reply to homeownership rate will be over 80% in the future because everyone will be able to own at least a small condo in low cost of living places due to remote work and indoor living. by Pitiful-Internal-196
yh no thanks. ill take renting in a decent area over home ownership in a shithole area.
​
also the sexdoll part is kind of sad imo.
maskedpaki t1_j5v2s8j wrote
Reply to comment by TallOutside6418 in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
maybe because the president didnt know high school chemistry
​
carl sagan also had to explain global warming to politicians.
maskedpaki t1_j57c9g9 wrote
Reply to comment by ldspsygenius in Nearly 30 percent of professionals say they have used ChatGPT at work by TheBestinHealth
It's an indicator of popularity at least. Means they likely have 10s of millions of users by now only 2 months post release.
maskedpaki t1_j57922l wrote
Reply to Recent mass layoffs by [deleted]
Take the tinfoil hat off
These layoffs were because the economy in general is shit not because chatgpt or recent LLMs
There were tech layoffs even before chatgpt
Even if he had strong AI my guess would be the tech sector booms with tonnes of new positions to effectively utilise the new tech and make money with it.
maskedpaki t1_j4s6o8j wrote
Reply to comment by korkkis in Is it wishful thinking that I feel like we’re way closer than we thought? by fignewtgingrich
I don't disagree but that wasn't the point of my comment
I was trying to demonstrate that slow takeoff scenarios post AGI are unlikely.
maskedpaki t1_j4qo6vh wrote
Reply to comment by Primo2000 in Is it wishful thinking that I feel like we’re way closer than we thought? by fignewtgingrich
I keep hearing this "AI will take long to blend into civilisation"
I don't buy it. We already have capitalist financial markets. If an AI driven growth engine gets 9% ROI and the market gets 6% then all the worlds capital gets channeled into the 9% growth engine. Especially when it's general purpose and can do everything so to speak.
Capitalism will drive the use of these ais the moment they are past AGI level. It's just a matter of reaching it.
maskedpaki t1_j3tcz2a wrote
Reply to comment by mnamilt in "Community" Prediction for General A.I continues to drop. by 420BigDawg_
making one system do all 4 is a lot harder than making 4 systems that do one each.
maskedpaki t1_j3tcteo wrote
Reply to comment by tatleoat in "Community" Prediction for General A.I continues to drop. by 420BigDawg_
you have it all backwards
generating long term hype is perfect for a tech startup for 2 reasons
- it overvalues the company based on long term potential. open ai only makes 60m in revenue. standard 10x multiplier would have it valued at 600m at the most. but its valued at 30 billion because of the hope that revenues will billions in the future
​
- you dont have to keep your long term promises. if he makes a promise for gpt4 people will call him out when it fails. but saying AGI 2035 and chances are no one will care when its 2035 and he doesnt deliver since the whole field will be different by then.
maskedpaki t1_j95ev1b wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in Update on Deepmind’s Gato? by Sharp_Soup_2353
No it's not. Chatgpt is worth money. People are paying 20 bucks for plus
Not an existential risk.