matrixislife
matrixislife t1_ix97k0u wrote
Reply to comment by nykgg in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
>it’s clearly the opposite
In your opinion. My assessment of their use of language is fine, in my opinion.
matrixislife t1_ix8ec6t wrote
Reply to comment by nykgg in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
Language choice takes second place when it comes to subject choice and manifestation of inherent biases. They are all papers that promote an ideology, they are the same imo.
matrixislife t1_ix83e90 wrote
Reply to comment by nykgg in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
That's what I meant. Some of the stuff they publish under "opinion" pieces is much worse than the redtops.
matrixislife t1_ix82idh wrote
Reply to comment by nykgg in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
I disagree. And let's not try to put the Grauniad too far ahead of other papers, they have their own issues.
matrixislife t1_ix7s9g7 wrote
Reply to comment by ItDoesntMatter59 in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
To explain why he disagrees? I didn't realise we were comparing word counts in responses.
matrixislife t1_ix5wvzg wrote
Reply to comment by taversham in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
I'm fine with the tone, if it were being positive about the BBC then they would have chosen a positive way to phrase it, "Back on the beeb, they were focussing on the important things instead" or somesuch, not "they were being gits"
matrixislife t1_ix5u7z0 wrote
Reply to comment by taversham in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
>The BBC declined to explain why it had shunted coverage of the opening ceremony – traditionally an opportunity for host countries to project soft power around the world – to an online-only stream.
>Even the former footballers brought in to analyse the actual sport for the BBC broke down any pretence that politics should be kept out of football.
>Back on the BBC, there was no such niceties,
>And then, after half an hour, the programme rapidly shifted towards discussion of football –......– and, eventually, 22 people kicking a ball around a pitch.
And it continues. This is not the Guardian getting firmly behind the Beeb. I was expecting them to be fully in lockstep, but apparently not.
matrixislife t1_ix5qca1 wrote
Reply to comment by itsalonghotsummer in BBC ignores World Cup opening ceremony in favour of Qatar criticism by AcknowledgeableReal
Nice to see a well thought out, concise and erudite rebuttal. Or it would have been.
Just to maintain the flavour of the thread..
Yes it does!
matrixislife t1_ix5mjck wrote
Wow, the Guardian sounds really pissed off that people have been having a go at Qatar.
matrixislife t1_ix49ooo wrote
Reply to comment by FatherOfLights88 in In honour of FIFA, who are absolutely not corrupt bastards by daveclampart
FIFA awards based on how big the bribe is though. If Qatar were to spend that money on improving conditions for people they'd just have to find more money to spend on the bribes.
matrixislife t1_iubvih5 wrote
What really bothers me is that the MPs were so cheap. £250k to MPs, £5mill to Fifa. Have some respect for your own country MPs, at least hold out for a decent bribe!
Or, don't get bribed at all, that'd be the best option ofc.
matrixislife t1_jdkevxo wrote
Reply to Monty Williams draws $20,000 fine for criticizing referees. by PrincessBananas85
Do people actually watch that blowhard in the video?