mlamping

mlamping OP t1_j6gmybb wrote

0.25 follows the thesis of a wait and see for next hike, meaning no increase next time. And also validates that possibility that they’ve hiked to high to fast, and that we may need to reverse course.

Just one of the hypotheticals.

This isn’t coming from me, or just out of thin air. Not sure why you wsb regards all pile on the same beliefs. This is just different data points to act upon.

Also, even burry believes this, that they’ll reverse course and cut, and possibly cause a double recession and inflation

4

mlamping OP t1_j6ggrfn wrote

It’s just a chart, no hopium, shit can go either way. It’s just a good data point showing if the market gets more bullish this week, these shorts will be in trouble. That’s all. This is data, you should understand what hopium means

4

mlamping OP t1_j6ge8jj wrote

Since November, looks like shorts began to cover, when we probably got the good cpi print and things squeezed up. But looks like some shorts re entered.

This could get interest, if we get a .25 rate hike or even 0, and good outlook, this means some shorts will massively cover.

We are potentially in an epic move up.

Just a good chart for you regards to ingest

Graph shows shorts since beginning last year. For all stocks, it’s the average days to cover.

Meaning that if you overlay spy, you can see when spy began a dump and the price it would theoretical bounce to if shorts went back to where they were at the beginning of the year

15

mlamping t1_j6fc9ni wrote

Interesting, after Tesla cut in prices, has Nio done the same? I know their profit margin is lower, would that impact their ability to lower? Would Tesla cause Nio to lose purchases?

3