mountainofclay

mountainofclay t1_ixovz6f wrote

Yeah if you live in the city it may not be the way but as far as it polluting keep in mind that modern wood stoves burn cleaner and heating with wood is considered carbon neutral, in theory anyway. https://www.chimneysolutions.com/blog/ecofriendly-wood-burning/ Still it is more labor intensive. So is walking or jogging over automobile but people still pay money to run on a treadmill. Crazy.

3

mountainofclay t1_ixnegfj wrote

2

mountainofclay t1_iwwhfm6 wrote

If anything Vermonters might be proud that the dirt bag corporation in Parsippany thought highly enough about the real stuff to try to steal the labeling. I’m pretty sure no one believes that crap is real maple syrup. And since one good turn deserves another I thought maybe Vermont could appropriate something only found in NJ but I couldn’t think of anything worthy.

0

mountainofclay t1_iv8gc3f wrote

I have 10 acres of hardwoods that I bought 30 years ago. I’ve cut firewood on it every year. Usually between 4 to 6 cords. I’ve also logged off the softwood twice in that time. There is now much more wood on that land than when I started. As far as it being sustainable and carbon neutral here is an article about this. https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/11/09/climate-curious-is-burning-wood-for-heat-carbon-neutral. In the late 1800s Vermont was largely deforested because of over harvesting. Much of the forest was simply burned down to make pasture for livestock. Wasted, in other words. Now the opposite is true. I agree that if everyone used wood to heat with and didn’t manage the forest properly then it would become deforested. I never said everyone should burn wood but only that for me it makes sense. Most people around me burn wood for part of their heat and the forest keeps growing. Many people who don’t burn wood do so because it is labor intensive. I get that, believe me. The good thing is the amount of labor required to cut a cord of wood stays the same. Price of other fuels fluctuates wildly and sends huge amounts of money into the hands of utility conglomerates and in some cases foreign governments that do not have our best interests at heart. I prefer to not give my money to the Saudi Arabians or Shell oil if I don’t have to. If you live in areas that are not forested than burning wood makes less sense.

1

mountainofclay t1_iv59xy2 wrote

I agree which is why I don’t have one but I suppose if most people used them the price would come down and it would reduce the use of other fuels like NG so that the supposed shortage of NG wouldn’t be an issue. I seriously looked into a heat pump to heat during the “shoulder” seasons but like you said, the high initial cost is tough to swallow. As it is I don’t think there is any shortage of NG. Just scare mongering. I’m reluctant to electrify everything. I’d rather have more control of what I need. I don’t know how there won’t be a shortage of electricity if cars all go electric. I have wood available or can buy it locally so I primarily use that but I also use propane and electric when I have to. I feel sorry for city people who don’t have access to alternative fuels. They are at the mercy of large industry.

1

mountainofclay t1_iujsnp8 wrote

Reply to Accurate by seanner_vt2

What percent of the Vermont population rents their home? Or, put another way, what percent of Vermonters don’t own their home? In a town like Burlington most people rent. In a town like Shelburne most people own. Owning your home is the key to affordability. Renting your home makes you subject to exploitation. Aside from students, who should be housed by the school they are attending, Not earning enough to own your home is the problem.

1

mountainofclay t1_iujpxod wrote

Reply to comment by thisoneisnotasbad in Accurate by seanner_vt2

Right. The energy and food sectors are exempt when figuring the National inflation rate. Funny how those industries are excluded. Petroleum and industrial agribusiness. Who needs gas and food anyway, sheesh!

1