The back end of the car is in the crosswalk. They'd get a ticket either way. Kudos to the Post for only bothering to write about traffic enforcement when NYPD bothers to enforce.

You're really trying to spin the corruption of Rikers as a universal fault of unions? Seriously?

Most people who write comments like that didn't know what a DA was before Tucker Carlson started talking about Alvin Bragg. They certainly don't know each borough has one.

>I wonder if this author is biased at all.

I mean, you want high praise for a project 14 years late and 7.5 billion over budget that provides minimal improvements in travel time mostly to out of city commuters? It's not a huge leap to see this project as the boondoggle it is.

Especially when half the escalators will probably be broken/out of order for the majority of the time this station is in service.

You know it probably would have been fine had multiple panelists on the hiring committee not told him to his face they thought he was young and talk of his husband made them uncomfortable. Those morons did this to themselves.

They asked him about his hobbies and he said he travels with his husband. The way most married people would answer if asked. Read the article you comment on first.

Did you read the article? The evidence is panelists said that to his face.

He has 33 years experience at a low level of qualification without specialty in public sector pensions, which Chu has. Chu also works in the office in question, making him far more knowledgeable on how it's managed.

>Chu said he believes he is more qualified than Tyszkiewicz on paper. For example, there are different levels once becoming an actuary: The first level is an associate, which requires passing seven preliminary actuarial exams and then meeting a few other requirements. 

>Chu is a fellow, which comes after passing three additional fellowship exams, he said. He is listed with the qualification by the Society of Actuaries, with a specialty in the public sector and pensions.

>Tyszkiewicz, though, is only at the lower apprentice level, according to the SOA.

Finish the story:

>Chu said he believes he is more qualified than Tyszkiewicz on paper. For example, there are different levels once becoming an actuary: The first level is an associate, which requires passing seven preliminary actuarial exams and then meeting a few other requirements.

>Chu is a fellow, which comes after passing three additional fellowship exams, he said. He is listed with the qualification by the Society of Actuaries, with a specialty in the public sector and pensions.

>Tyszkiewicz, though, is only at the lower apprentice level, according to the SOA

So the out of state candidate who got the job has spent 33 years at a lower level. He is in fact less qualified than Chu. The panelists never said Chu was less qualified - they said he was young (protected category) and he made some of them uncomfortable (because he talked about his husband). He could easily win this suit.

Finally, I agree with a cop. This is such a waste of money. The Mayor's been crowing about how we're in this terrifying fiscal crisis but we're shilling out for a new fleet? The fuck for?

I do hand that to de Blasio. He did that show every single week. He always took questions. It was a consistent spot for people to reach him. Eric Adams is all over the place, focusing mainly on cheesy shock jocks to just love him.

A casino at the UN is incredibly bleak.

And boy are they regretting it now.

The truth? Or his truth?

The only people who will subscribe to this newsletter are the journalists who will be reporting on it. Great use of city resources to boost the fragile ego of a single man.

>assume the relationship isn't based on power or manipulation or anything like that

Lol so we're just playing make believe. 🚩🚩🚩

You keep replying to comments about adults dating teenagers with your "age is just a number" comments and you're confused as to why you seem like a massive red flag? This story isn't about age gaps. It's about preying on teenagers. If you actually thought that was abhorrent you wouldn't be spending so much energy talking about your older wife.

I'm talking about adults dating teenagers. Not age gaps between 30 year olds. If you met your wife when she was 18 and you were 26 (or visa versa), that's pretty gross though.

So many people telling in themselves in this comment section. There's really something special about adults with life experience who want to date teenagers fresh out of school. BuT iTs TeChNiCaLLy LeGaL. Yea, and you're still a creep. It takes a special 24 year old, for example, who prefers the company of a teenager with no life experience to someone their own age.

/s? I hope?

Man you're really telling on yourself.

...I beg you to recognize the difference between a 49 year old dating a 43 year old and a 24 year old dating an 18 year old. This is a lot of mental gymnastics to excuse an adult dating a teenager.

You don't know the difference between dating an 18 year old teenager right out of highschool and someone past college age? 🚩

Some things can be technically legal but still morally and ethically wrong. I don't like the Post either, but this isn't a "spin." You should seriously question any 26 year old who dates or marries an 18 year old.