BurnerAcc2020 didn't misrepresent anything, you just failed at reading comprehension. They correctly state the stated affects by 2300 from the posted article. They then reference another source with a different prediction, and what the worst case scenario is per that quoted article. 2 different articles with different prediction/conclusions, a presented that way. The quoted article is around 2 years older so that is another thing to consider when evaluating both.
mrbucknut t1_j3me8zp wrote
Reply to comment by CornucopiaOfDystopia in Deep overturning circulation collapses with strong warming, which could cause a "disaster" in the world's oceans. by sibti
BurnerAcc2020 didn't misrepresent anything, you just failed at reading comprehension. They correctly state the stated affects by 2300 from the posted article. They then reference another source with a different prediction, and what the worst case scenario is per that quoted article. 2 different articles with different prediction/conclusions, a presented that way. The quoted article is around 2 years older so that is another thing to consider when evaluating both.