You absolutely have not determined for me what constitutes a search of my private residence by a gov't offical. I dunno why you think you did.

You ain't won yet, let's the voters decide if you can send DHSS on people for simply existing.

Bradshaw literally slammed SW MO with "OMGee the home growers will kill your kids" messaging.

No one is saying it isn't occuring, we can fucking do better.

I damn near tabled the whole damn initiative after 2016 insisting on having home cultivation in the language. The same exact people you supporting now, fought me tooth and nail to get home cultivation excluded.

Go ahead, tell just your perspective of my history. What bad awful thing did I do next?

This isn't progress. Progress includes actual steps forward.

That's a bold claim. It's still gonna be the same MO market.

We gotta stop arresting people for weed. Why is that such a hard concept to grasp.

Prohibition was never successful at stopping the legacy market, how do you think this legilstation will move the legacy market towards the regulated market now fully under control of the MO gov't?

The NAACP has said to vote no on this legislation, because they know who will continue to be arrested.

Ok, so what do you think points 4 and 5 mean?

No snark, full on prohibition didn't solve points 4, and 5. This language won't either.

Do we really need to continue to learn these lessons?

And?

Can't wait to arrest legacy growers eh?

Would you be surprised to know that you have an inherent right to demand a warrant from a health dept offical who wants entrance your private residence.

The purpose is laid out on page 17. ..

1. Legalize with limits 21 and over

2. Allow Gov't to control production

3. Prevent arrests for for those 21/over within Legal possessions limits

4. Remove Commercial production from illicit market

5. Prevent revenue from going to criminal enterprise.

The purpose of the language is to stop the illicit market. Read it! Page 17 under the Purpose section.

That concept of ending the illicit market and stopping cannabis arrests are incompatible.

I can absolutely imagine the current Supreme Court justices using the same reasoning to allow States the ability to choose if woman can vote.

They just allowed states to determine when to recognize and reinforce an inherent right.

Pretty selfish of hIm? The expungement requires Parson to sign off on the Expungement.

You sure "selfish' is the right word?

You think those industry owners aren't gonna use the law the stop that?

Read the purpose of the language. It literally says the legislation is designed to stop the illicit Market.

The flyer came from Missouri NORML.

Thanks!

Gov't is gov't. Do you think the DHSS offical is not a part of gov't? The scenario laid is an example if gov't entry without a warrant.

"DHSS has the right to inspect your grow" It's rights there.

I don't understand what is confusing?

I honestly have no idea.

No, I've read the community page. Again, you are welcome to ignore the similarities between Galloway's page and the page that was used to hunt Ahmed Audrey, but I'm not.

Those people getting what they want, via gov't or neighborhood harassment. This is a tale as old as America.

Well, continue to wonder why they are being branded like they are.

Eh, find there Facebook community page and compare to the neighborhood community page that lead to Ahmed Audrey's death.

I absolutely can see some of them hunting down poors who dare enter there domain.

These types of issues have been used in Missouri for at least a hundred years to keep poor entrapped in poverty.

The entire St. Louis City/St Louis County problems are rooted in the division lines enacted for the World's Fair in the early 1900's.

Dixiecrats gonna do what they do.

Greene county cops doubling down on assest forfeiture, home wise.

Sounds like a great plan (sarcasm)

Something about heavy enforcement of nuisance crimes gets people excited.

I can't understand the logic.