nicuramar

nicuramar t1_j6ph4w8 wrote

Reply to comment by Due_Cauliflower_9669 in ChatGPT is on its way to becoming a virtual doctor, lawyer, and business analyst. Here's a list of advanced exams the AI bot has passed so far. by rationalworld

> Where does “better training data” come from? These bots are using data from the open web.

The raw data is from there, among other things, but there is more to it. It was trained using supervised learning and reinforced learning.

1

nicuramar t1_j6pdzrd wrote

Reply to comment by tomistruth in TikTok CEO to testify before U.S. Congress over security concerns by liquid_deflation

> Google scans all your email attachments and reads all your emails. Facebook scans all your msg and images. Apple recently activated mandatory facial and body scanning on all photos.

Facebook doesn’t scan WhatsApp messages at least, and Apple hasn’t implemented anything like that. Where does that come from?

> The only reason Tiktok is in the news is because it is made by a foreign adversary. A hostile nation.

That I agree with, except “hostile nation” is exaggerated a bit.

1

nicuramar t1_j6abs1h wrote

Reply to comment by SailingNaked in If you could instantaneously place a space telescope at any desired distance (LYs), from any planet/galaxy etc., where would it be and what would you be documenting? And for what purpose? by kennyarsen

> You and OP are still wrong,

I’m not OP or defending their views. I am just saying that expansion is stated as a rate, and doesn’t have units of velocity. I know how expansion works, and I wasn’t talking about that. You don’t need to keep explaining it, at least not for my sake :)

1

nicuramar t1_j689lu5 wrote

Reply to comment by Feeling_Percentage_9 in If you could instantaneously place a space telescope at any desired distance (LYs), from any planet/galaxy etc., where would it be and what would you be documenting? And for what purpose? by kennyarsen

That’s not exactly correct? First, you’ll still be in orbit around something. It’s just some local gravity that cancels. Second, an orbit is another point where you can stay indefinitely. “Location” is pretty relative.

3

nicuramar t1_j68311l wrote

Reply to comment by SailingNaked in If you could instantaneously place a space telescope at any desired distance (LYs), from any planet/galaxy etc., where would it be and what would you be documenting? And for what purpose? by kennyarsen

> That is where OP and you are wrong, and that’s their point I wanted to clarify. The words are interchangeable

Well, it’s just arguing semantics. Since I know how it actually works, irrespective of what you or I wish to call it, I am not going to address the rest of the comment.

−2

nicuramar t1_j680kt5 wrote

Reply to comment by SaishDawg in If you could instantaneously place a space telescope at any desired distance (LYs), from any planet/galaxy etc., where would it be and what would you be documenting? And for what purpose? by kennyarsen

> I would say our best candidate for a planet with intelligent life. That’s cheating though since we don’t have one (maybe life, but no signs of intelligence yet).

I was gonna say “earth” until you added the last bit ;)

2

nicuramar t1_j6807ie wrote

Reply to comment by SailingNaked in If you could instantaneously place a space telescope at any desired distance (LYs), from any planet/galaxy etc., where would it be and what would you be documenting? And for what purpose? by kennyarsen

> At any point in space, the Hubble flow is the same. That is why it’s called a constant. It is the same everywhere.

Yeah, but you said “speed of expansion” in the other comment, which doesn’t exist, since it’s a rate ;). Maybe that’s what they meant.

0