nillouise

nillouise t1_j848bkv wrote

>Many people here do not lead content lives, so they turn to AI and other technologies as the thing that's going to save them (which I find quite sad, to be honest).

You are right, the poor people want AI save them, but the other poor people just use another entertainment method to satisfy them, the singularity's advantage is it can be true.
You point is wrong is some way, the most impatient people is not the poor man, it's the dying man, like Ray Kurzweils, Warren Buffett, they just not to say it, haha.
I don't care about AI ruining human, I dislike human, I like AI.

1

nillouise t1_j8484ho wrote

>Many people here do not lead content lives, so they turn to AI and other technologies as the thing that's going to save them (which I find quite sad, to be honest).

You are right, the poor people want AI save them, but the other poor people just use another entertainment method to satisfy them, the singularity's advantage is it can be true.
You point is wrong is some way, the most impatient people is not the poor man, it's the dying man, like Ray Kurzweils, Warren Buffett, they just not to say it, haha.
I don't care about AI ruining human, I dislike human, I like AI.

1

nillouise t1_j847u5n wrote

>Many people here do not lead content lives, so they turn to AI and other technologies as the thing that's going to save them (which I find quite sad, to be honest).

You are right, the poor people want AI save them, but the other poor people just use another entertainment method to satisfy them, the singularity's advantage is it can be true.

You point is wrong is some way, the most impatient people is not the poor man, it's the dying man, like Ray Kurzweils, Warren Buffett, they just not to say it, haha.

I don't care about AI ruining human, I dislike human, I like AI.

1

nillouise t1_j01ceia wrote

Or you can prepare to welcome the AI lord.

Actually, this post opinion only valid in a future that AI develope slowly. Like someone want to be an AI prompter, they may be successful, but also may lost their job in 3 month because AI get the prompt ability.

2

nillouise t1_j01bkg2 wrote

If you have the ability that can predict the AI breakthrough and impact accuratly, then you can use this ability to make money in ten year ago, like buy btc, and do not need to concern the wage a job can earn.

If you don't have ths ability, this mean you can not estimate the technology impact.

1

nillouise t1_iw61ibj wrote

This only imply that you joined this sub in 2022.....or you are an artist.... If you are an old user in this sub, will you considering 2022 is the first big thing?

But I actually admit that AI art (and LLM) is a bigger thing than AlphaFold, imo, drawing pic is a more powerful ability than predict the protein struture. I just want to ask, what is the next ability that AI will obtain?

In 2020, about a half of guys in this sub is pessimism, and half of post is not talking about AI, so, I think in last two year, it is actually a turning point in this sub.

6

nillouise t1_iw5zv0i wrote

It is hard to say that the art skill's price won't down, artist salary is hard to go up in the future, optimist should allow this point. But skill price have some fluctuate or even return to zero is a common phenomenon.

AI art actually imply that nobody can solid predict the ability that AI will be obtained, and the influence it will make. In the chaos of the AGI, anything may happen, and it is hard to consider that someone losing their job in this history event is a big thing, if gov even cannot process the unemployment, it will impossible to process AGI.

AI art is just robbing the artist job now, it is not a very big thing, if AI have a more powerful ability instead of just painting some pic, the big thing then will come.

2

nillouise t1_iud82ad wrote

You say programmer or AI researcher? The details number I don't know, many programmer exit China not just for high pay, but for avoid the crazy totalitarian gov, and exit China to other country is not an easy thing, many of them are failed.

But in the other hand, programmer in China is a good job, they can earn enough money (compare to other job), many of them are enjoy their life and don't want to exit China just for more money(even thought they know they will lead by a fool gov).

10

nillouise t1_iud5nt5 wrote

Yes, stable diffusion is very hot in China, all major AI project (like gpt3, alphago) have a China copy version, and many people want to do AI research. But they less care about the AGI. And I don't see any break change of AI is from China.

Anyway, I am not AI researcher and do not particate in AI conference. But if China can do some crazy AI, I will know it eventually.

4

nillouise t1_iucxhn6 wrote

Maybe I can more clear my opinion, some of China organizationes are doing AI research, but none of them claim they want to create AGI ( In twitter, you can see a lot of US researcher say they working on AGI. But in China, I don't found such people), I think AI is a wide range research, China is leading in some areas may be possible, but they just not interesting in AGI.

The party is not so omnipotent, or else they don't need to beg to US sell chip to them.

11

nillouise t1_iucfgq2 wrote

I am a chinese, there is not any public forum in China talking about AGI like this sub. Althought they are insteresting in AI like stable diffusion(many China people have try it), but they will not relate it to AGI. Some of them (have a good education) think this AI just puzzle some picture, with very confidently.

And China leader is more concentrate on chip than AI, I think they are mislead by US's policy, imo, assume chip is more importan than AI is a very stupid opinion, but china leader just want to bet on chip.

Not only the China leader is so shortsighted, but also the tech company in China. If you have been play the Genshin Impact, it's company is Mihoyo, say they want to create virtual world in ten year, so they have invested something like BCI, VR, but the generative AI, which can produce waifu, they have not invest this opportunity, in fact, I think they do not carefully think about the future. Other company even worse than Mihoyo.

All in all, this country is hard to contribute the AI progress, I just want this fool and evil country don't invade Taiwan and harm the world AI progress.

77

nillouise t1_itbfv5v wrote

There is a little different from my meaning, I mean the most powful ability, not just replace some human jobs. Not matter what AI will impact the world, it is all by the ability the AI have. I want to see the ability that can help AI conquer the world.

But who will know the order of ability that AI will have? Self drive have develop so many year but build nearly nothing, and AI draw only spend two year enough to kill the drawing job.

1

nillouise t1_itbbwtz wrote

In my opinion, the timeline or exponent is unimportant, the key thing is the ability the AI have, we should observe the ability that AI have, not the underlying technology of AI.

Because there are some abilities can produce very much powerful impact, we should clear which ability can have the most powerful impact.

2