can you finetune OpenAssistant's model? https://huggingface.co/OpenAssistant/oasst-sft-1-pythia-12b I hear their pythia language model isn't very good or maybe gpt-j which is more consumer grade friendly.

>Lastly, the idea that AGI will be coldly logical and robotic like Spock is dumb. Emotions are a form of intelligence. We have them for a reason - they are useful. If they weren’t useful, evolution would have selected for Spock, not emotions, in mammals.

They made sense in evolution where it created multiple intelligences to cooperate in order to survive in a hostile environment. Not so much in artificial intelligence where it was created in a lab.

>They can claim whatever they like, but it shouldn't be taken seriously if they hide the important details behind fake excuses of "safety". From the paper:

They already admitted 'competitive landscape' aka money. Everything else is bullshit.

They said competitive landscape reasons or safety reasons but we all know it's the former.

Where's the option that says, "I didn't get access"?

>You can only run what fits on your available hardware.

Precisely.

but in industry, don't we want things to be cheap? cost might be a bigger factor than performance.

>T5

but isn't it much heavier?

Where would you get the money and technology from? This cheaper thing is entirely dependent on them currently and won't be necessary once they have AI.

My dude there's no such thing as a narrow general AI. Narrow and general are antonyms. You've just described narrow AI.

Jobs don't really make geniuses. Most people are employed but most people are not geniuses. There's not even a correlation.

>but I want to add that the poor people of the future will live no worse than today's rich, and even their housing will look luxurious compared to today's standards.

Why? There's no incentive to increase living standards.

>narrow AGIs

What?

>they're easy as shit to copy because they're just code.

You can't copy and paste GPUs.

>Look at the old woman and tell me that looks normal.

Hindsight bias.

"ChatGPT might be really great at sounding intelligent, but the question is, can it be empathetic? And that, not yet at least, it can't," added Franklin.

He admitted there's a chance.

>Would you envision the user would have a drop-down menu of modes to choose from?

Hell no. Just one all knowing intelligence please.

>Microsoft has a pretty large share in Open AI

That's an understatement, they look like the parent company from a distance.

Is a survival instinct or anger a sign of sentience? What is even sentience?

ChatGPT has more under the hood, it's a finetuned version of 3.5 and it was trained on Text and data before 2021. It was using reinforcement learning with human feedback.

>This is already done and it's already been implemented in the most popular web-ui for stable diffusion too. Granted the results aren't perfect yet.

that's gpt3.

>They train a language model with all Blender commands, and all possible outcomes. Then the model learns to control blender, allowing the user to be guided through it or the user can ask for what it wants through a text prompt. How far?

can probably be done this year. does it require expensive hardware? Is it slow? is it bad? most likely.

>. That's the one thing actually enjoyable about life

Opinion.

I think he meant more about open source being threatened.

why is living absurd? Is it less or more absurd than not living?