nycdevil
nycdevil t1_iqn64he wrote
Reply to comment by mmmmyah in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
It's not a desert, there's mm wave all over DTJC, it just doesn't look like it on the map because the range is so limited around tall buildings.
nycdevil t1_iqn5fxm wrote
Reply to comment by HappyArtichoke7729 in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
I mean, streaming bidirectional AR content running on edge servers would be a good mobile use case that would probably need that sort of latency and bandwidth eventually in a mobile environment.
nycdevil t1_iqn2mbz wrote
Reply to comment by HappyArtichoke7729 in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
Useful for much right now other than general speed and responsiveness? Probably not. But you don't build new network infrastructure for today's needs, you do it for tomorrow's.
nycdevil t1_iqmr09i wrote
Reply to comment by gearheadsub92 in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
Probably more of a good idea for suburban environments to prevent them from having to wire fiber to each house. Running a fiber cable to a dense 400-unit building is a lot more cost-effective.
That said, there have been millimeter-wave high-speed point-to-point internet services at commercial buildings in NY and Chicago for years. Just need to put the antenna on a tall building and point it at other buildings.
nycdevil t1_iqmpm9n wrote
Reply to comment by jerseyboiii in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
Getting a 2-gigabit connection on the streets of dense urban areas and in large stadiums and arenas is useful.
nycdevil t1_iqmmgzl wrote
JC was one of the first, which is why we got millimeter wave coverage, which is super fast but doesn't go through buildings. Look at a lot of the DTJC streets, for instance.
Later phases use mid-band spectrum, which isn't quite as fast but has much more range.
nycdevil t1_iqna5rq wrote
Reply to comment by HappyArtichoke7729 in JC has hardly any Verizon 5G Ultrawide coverage - way less than Newark (!) by mmmmyah
Doesn't get better latency currently; theoretically, it can cut latency to single-digit milliseconds to the edge.