objectimpermanence

objectimpermanence t1_iweplxx wrote

Reply to comment by AVespucci in Modera lofts experience? by karuso2012

I almost rented there a couple years ago, but I backed out after getting weird vibes from the landlord.

They took forever to approve my application and respond to basic questions. I figured if that’s how they treat prospective tenants, it must be even worse once you’re locked into a lease.

I later learned that the the same landlord is behind Lafayette Lofts, which is another nice-looking building that has tons of terrible reviews online.

2

objectimpermanence t1_iw58hzl wrote

Hoboken has a plethora of public transit options compared to most parts of JC. They have the NJ Transit commuter trains, frequent bus service to the Port Aithority, the light rail, and PATH. No matter where you are in Hoboken, you’re rarely more than a 5-10 minute walk to one of those systems.

It’s almost too much for such a small city. Especially for a city that refuses to allow dense residential development next to the Hoboken Terminal, which has plenty of excess capacity. It’s such a wasted opportunity.

The state should take away some of Hoboken’s transit goodies as punishment for their NIMBY housing policies. (I’m half-joking)

10

objectimpermanence t1_iw4x0do wrote

I have noticed that some of their stuff feels rather thin and less durable than I would like.

But washing clothes in cold water and line drying them really helps extend their life. I never put anything from Uniqlo in the dryer to avoid the extra wear and tear.

Just mentioning this because I know a lot of people toss everything in the dryer out of habit.

5

objectimpermanence t1_iw31gwn wrote

The Beacon is not exactly in a prime location. These buildings probably wouldn’t have been redeveloped back then without the abatements. Or the project would’ve been seriously scaled back.

Read up on the history of the condos at the Beacon. Here’s one story about it.

Sales started shortly before the financial crisis in 2008. For years, they had a tough time selling units even with the tax abatement. Units were selling at auction at deep discounts.

They may not have gone ahead with the rest of the project or delayed it indefinitely without abatements, which would mean lost revenue for the city.

Construction jobs and PILOT revenues (i.e., the $22k/year from this penthouse unit) are better than a massive complex of abandoned buildings that contribute nothing to the city.

It would be a different story if you were talking about some of the waterfront high rises with generous abatements, like 77 Hudson or Crystal Point. Those building are in much better locations and probably would have quickly sold out once the economy recovered even without abatements.

13

objectimpermanence t1_ivys6y0 wrote

The Board of Education directly controls the schools budget, not the city council or the mayor’s office.

I think the question we should be asking is why the BOE can’t get basic capital projects done despite having the ability to independently raise the school tax levy.

I suspect the answer is that adding HVAC to all the old school buildings would be very expensive (probably way more than what the city will spend on this museum) and that raising school taxes to pay for it is not politically feasible, especially considering the blowback that the BOE has faced from its recent tax increases.

6

objectimpermanence t1_ivyr9ly wrote

The difference is that none of those failed museums involved a partnership with a major institution like Pompidou, which actually knows a thing or two about running museums.

The Pompidou Centre in Paris will be completely closed for renovations until 2027. If they lend the JC museum artworks from their collection during that time, that could be a good way to jumpstart interest and attract visitors from around the metro area.

5

objectimpermanence t1_iv88b4j wrote

Shuster actually did buy a house there. I looked him up in the county’s online property tax records when this debacle started and saw that he had bought a house there pretty recently.

But I really doubt he ever lived there. He and wife have owned a massive, ultra luxurious house in Paulus Hook for a number of years.

He most likely bought the Saddlewood Court house as a legal bargaining chip he could use in his attempt to thwart a competing developer’s redevelopment plans.

A few years back, Shuster himself was in the process of buying out homeowners so he could redevelop the site. Then Lennar came in and outmaneuvered him and managed to get the city to award the redevelopment deal to Lennar instead of Shuster.

This story helps explain Shuster’s motivations.

2

objectimpermanence t1_iv80rf8 wrote

The station replacement at Harrison is basically a vanity project.

The main problems with the old station buildings were narrow staircases and no elevators. It shouldn’t cost $250 million and 10 years of construction and service disruptions to fix that.

The irony is that most passengers at Harrison spend only 15-30 seconds in the station building itself. Most of the time, people choose to wait outside on the platform.

Yet even once this boondoggle of a project is finally complete, the canopy won’t extend the entire length of the platform to keep people from getting wet in the rain or snow.

3

objectimpermanence t1_iuxetti wrote

Reply to comment by Yr9012 in Recessed Lighting by smokeymacncheese

>it is legally the owner’s responsibility to change the light bulbs of the recessed lighting

Maybe I'm misinformed, but I've literally never heard of that being a thing.

Even if that’s true, I wouldn’t be surprised if installation costs are more of an issue than anything else. Recessed lights are generally more complicated to install than other types of fixtures.

In older buildings, they can be more difficult to retrofit than traditional ceiling mounted fixtures.

Meanwhile, most high rise apartments have concrete slab ceilings. In that case, you need to build a soffit or a false ceiling to house a recessed fixture, which adds to costs and reduces ceiling heights.

The concrete slab issue is also why many high rise apartments have very few lighting fixtures (of any type) built into the ceiling in bedrooms and living rooms. Without some type of false ceiling, the electrical stuff needs to be built into the slab during construction in order to avoid having an ugly exposed conduit running along the ceiling.

6

objectimpermanence t1_iu6t57e wrote

Yeah they used premium only because that’s what the manual said and the car’s gas cap was labeled “premium fuel only.”

But Shell’s premium grade also has extra additives (“V-Power”) beyond what their regular and middle grades have.

At most other brands, the premium grade has the same additives as the brand’s other grades.

3

objectimpermanence t1_iu6kzc0 wrote

> They tend to (but not always) use the minimal detergent requirements under the law. So more buildup in your engine. Vs a “Top Tier” gas, which is what your owners manual will recommend you use.

It’s interesting because that’s potential a problem for newer cars with direct injection that most people probably are unaware of. Not that most people know whether their engine has direct injection and/or port injection to begin with.

That said, my parents had a direct injected car that they religiously filled only with premium Shell or Chevron gasoline and it still ended up needing an expensive repair to clean the carbon buildup on the intake valves after about 100k miles.

Apparently, the design of some engines makes them inherently prone to carbon buildup no matter what type of gas you use.

6

objectimpermanence t1_iu0dw4u wrote

PATH’s budget is smaller than the NYC subway’s.

But their operating costs per passenger mile are higher than the NYC subway, as well as most other subway systems in the world.

> This is also the reason why the PATH will never be expanded because any new tunnels will need to be built to current freight railroad standards.

I don’t think that’s the main reason. My understanding is that the burden of PATH being regulated as a federal railroad mainly comes in the form of operational inefficiencies. Though the Feds did require PATH to upgrade its signal system sooner than they would have otherwise.

Due to corruption and a lack of accountability, building tunnels in the NYC metro area is extremely expensive no matter what kind of tunnel it is. It’s significantly more expensive than it is even in cities like London and Paris.

Our capacity to build major new infrastructure projects will be limited until we somehow get a handle on these absolutely insane construction costs.

4

objectimpermanence t1_itsiglg wrote

Curious to know if your friend (or anyone else for that matter) has photos of Pavonia Terminal.

There are hardly any photos of that place online, especially of the interiors, which is super weird for what was such a major terminal.

1