So, for the layman... Obesity makes some cancer worse and /or more prevalent? Or harder to treat? What's STING stimulation?

Have you met these people? Stolen Valor is their wheelhouse... I'm sure they'd just claim it's civil asset forfeiture, not theft... And so what if it was? Qualified Immunity.

It's not a real purple heart, it's like a participation trophy from the local trophy shop... You can just give anyone any shape award and make it any color you want to... That doesn't make it official.

Imagine how caught off guard Breonna Taylor must have felt

edit: commented before realizing this wasn't about the other patrons being offended by a display of the brutal reality we live in, but some sick fuck GOP shitheels reveling in her death like it was a training video or something. Not sure if/how that changes the context :/

unless you own a book and a candle

Definitely-ish, but mostly a few different printers (minus the motors, maybe the nozel, and control computer) ... Look up the rep-rap printer https://reprap.org/wiki/Build_A_RepRap designed to be able to print as many of its own parts as possible... Obviously at minimum the nozel needs to be metal, and the control board would need A specialized printer if you wanted to print that too... The motors and microchips will still probably need other manufacturing techniques to produce for the foreseeable future

Awesome context... As I'm not a c# dev (well, my professional use of c# was extremely short lived and 10+ years ago...)... I was thinking in terms of what little java I know (also not a java dev) but how basically all options 9n a variable are enumerated in long-form when declaring ( public static String blah blah...) and just imagining (naively, based on the previous comment) that it might have been as simple as adding a byref or byval to the string of qualifiers when using a class to get struct behavior (and defaulting to some sane default where omitted)... Is this even relevant to the situation either in c# having such qualifiers or in classes and structs being sufficiently similar for that to be feasible (if only everything had been different)?

Huh... TIL... you'd think rather than coming up with a whole new name they'd just add another declaration keyword to do whatever the non-default thing is...

So think of classes as representing a thing... Like pie. You can make a new pie and it's not the class itself, but it is A pie.

Constructors are like a method that runs upon making a new pie... Set the flavor, crust type, size, et cetera.

Methods are things the pie does (the metaphor is breaking down a bit, but stay with me)... A pie might have an "eat" method that subtracts from it's current amount and returns a text description of the subtle flavor notes... Or maybe a specific message for the last slice about how uncle marvin was pissdd because he was saving that piece for your aunt. (so, like a function that belongs to a class)

I'm not a C# dev so while the rest may be close enough, Imma have to just have a go at describing structs: I'm pretty sure they just typed sets of properties... Like a class without methods... Like you might instead make a pie struct (because honestly, pies probably don't need methods, they don't DO a lot, and they're probably not dynamic or complex enough to need a constructor) so then you just make a "feast" class that has a bunch of food struct-typed properties with single eat method that takes the name of a food and subtracts from its quantity