plz1

plz1 t1_itravlf wrote

It means just that. This vote is to either have one, or not. It's on the ballot every decade, but the last one passed in the 1980's. If you think we need to amend the state constitution, vote for it, or if not, vote no. One caution I'd personally give is this is a big opportunity for enough crazies to get something they want, without going through the traditional legislative process. Just the thought of the Freestater movement getting anything via this avenue is enough for me to vote no on it.

18

plz1 t1_ito6jcx wrote

I live in NH with a company HQ'd in Boston. I don't pay Mass taxes and haven't for about 4 years since I stopped working even partially in MA. As others have noted, if you physically work in NH, you are not working in MA, so no taxes. If you aren't 100% remote, you owe MA taxes on the days you work in MA, but MA isn't coming after you for that one day you had in-town meetings per quarter.

When I was only partially remote, my payroll team would tax me at 40% of normal (I was 3 days remote) for MA.

10