razorbeamz
razorbeamz t1_ja6x3fj wrote
Within the next three years there will be a feature length movie made with this technique.
razorbeamz OP t1_izcj8q9 wrote
Reply to comment by darklinux1977 in What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
Did you write this in another language and machine translate it to English? It doesn't make sense.
razorbeamz OP t1_izbpxq9 wrote
Reply to comment by rdlenke in What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
>people would probably still call it plagiarism, wouldn't they?
That would be trademark violation likely, not plagiarism.
razorbeamz OP t1_iz9mazo wrote
Reply to comment by MaddMax92 in What do you think of all the recent very vocal detractors of AI generated art? by razorbeamz
The signatures are replicated in the corner because a lot of art has signatures in the corner. It's not trying to replicate any particular artist's signature (especially because it doesn't and can't try anything), it's just reproducing something seen in art.
razorbeamz t1_iz3sjjp wrote
Reply to comment by rlanham1963 in What are your predictions for 2023? How did your predictions for 2022 turn out? by Foundation12a
Number 6 seems really far fetched to me. Maybe they might encourage it but I can't see them requiring it.
razorbeamz t1_iwap548 wrote
I would know it. The eyes are really messed up, and it just looks like Midjourney's style.
razorbeamz t1_ja6yj7g wrote
Reply to comment by Ok_Sea_6214 in Singularity claims its first victim: the anime industry by Ok_Sea_6214
> Now that they've set this up, my question is why not create a feature length movie by next week?
Because feature length movies take a lot of time to make.