regaphysics
regaphysics t1_j4ovlep wrote
Reply to comment by F-21 in Leather vs Nylon for a Travel Bag by ms_misfit0808
There are high quality leather products that require a lot of maintenance, and low quality leather that requires little maintenance. If there’s any correlation, it’s weak.
Generally leather quality is based on the quality of the hide (what part of the hide, what weather conditions the cows lived in, what scars they had, etc.), the type of leather (full grain, corrected grain etc), thickness, and the quality of the tanning.
Yes you can judge leather by the amount of maintenance it requires, but you’d be eliminating many of the better options in other metrics.
regaphysics t1_j4nca32 wrote
Reply to comment by F-21 in Leather vs Nylon for a Travel Bag by ms_misfit0808
Quality doesn’t really correlate with how much maintenance. Many “lower quality” leathers actually usually require less maintenance because they’re tanned with more chemicals (or are coated with coatings) that retain moisture better than your regular high quality veg tan. You might have less folding, but you’ll get plenty of UV, water, salt, sweat, etc., on a bag.
But in any event, beefy nylon is very durable - the only major weakness is tearing.
regaphysics t1_j4mym8k wrote
Reply to comment by F-21 in Leather vs Nylon for a Travel Bag by ms_misfit0808
Thick nylon ripstop is durable stuff. Just as long lived or more than high quality leather. It just can tear a bit easier. All leather requires maintenance, regardless of quality. It loses moisture and will crack.
regaphysics t1_j4mb2cl wrote
Reply to Leather vs Nylon for a Travel Bag by ms_misfit0808
Nylon will be lighter and better with water obviously. Leather is a bit more durable around sharp/rough objects…. Leather requires maintenance, nylon doesn’t.
Personally I’d go nylon because the weight and weaknesses of leather, but it depends how you use it and what you value.
regaphysics t1_j2v0jgx wrote
Reply to Durable Chukka boots? by ChunkyBrassMonkey
Ll bean
regaphysics t1_j2ipsdl wrote
Silicone. Sorry but it’s the truth.
regaphysics t1_j2b9egx wrote
Reply to comment by captain_almonds in Love my Olakais. Bought these in 2015 and have worn them every day since. Despite the holes they are incredibly comfortable. I decided to upgrade to Leather. by Accomplished_Alarm_1
Wore my pair at a Hawaiian wedding so I’m pretty much Olukai royalty now
regaphysics t1_j296ii6 wrote
Reply to Love my Olakais. Bought these in 2015 and have worn them every day since. Despite the holes they are incredibly comfortable. I decided to upgrade to Leather. by Accomplished_Alarm_1
I have had both and liked the foam more. The leather is mostly for looks / fancy occasions where you want to wear flip flops.
regaphysics t1_j24986h wrote
A ton depends on the exact species and the way it’s processed, but bamboo / maple / ash are generally going to be the best three.
regaphysics t1_j242un7 wrote
Comfy but not terribly durable.
regaphysics t1_j22pq38 wrote
People disagree. Personally I consider it to be something that is going to last at least 15-20 years with relatively minimal expense.
Some people think it’s just “it lasts longer than other things in the category.” Like boots that have durable uppers with replaceable soles, or a Toyota that requires less maintenance than average. Personally “buy high quality products and/or reparable products” Is not bifl to me, but to each their own.
I have a desk made out of 4” thick ancient old growth wood that was used in a cotton gin built in the 1820s. I’ve had it for 10 years and obviously, it still looks new. It’s 200 year old wood and a metal base. That’s bifl (and your kids’ lives).
regaphysics t1_j21v4f4 wrote
Reply to 2016 Toyota Sienna 83k miles by MichGuy0
I’d check if / when some of the more expensive routine things were replaced: (1) tires, (2) transmission fluid, (3) differential fluid , (4) brake fluid, (5) timing chain/belt, (6) brake rotors, (7) struts/ shocks. The more of those that have been serviced, the less you’ll have. If none of those have been, you could be looking at a mountain of maintenance expense considering the mileage is right on the edge of when those things will be necessary.
regaphysics t1_j1rsj9u wrote
Reply to comment by IndyScan in Dedicated this Christmas for all the Darn Tough Socks I'll ever need. by N64SmashBros
You aren’t alone. I don’t hate the tight fit for hiking - that’s really what they built it for - but I definitely don’t like darn tough for daily use. My feet end up far warmer and more comfortable in looser and thicker socks. I also have regular width feet.
regaphysics t1_j1gr6us wrote
Saddleback is the longest lasting / toughest but it’s a bit chunky. And I’ve tried a lot of wallets.
regaphysics t1_j0e5djs wrote
My wife is like this and the best option (for a regular style chair) - as silly as it may sound - is those huge executive chairs you see at staples. They are mega wide, which is what you need.
regaphysics t1_j01z7c3 wrote
Reply to Guess which can opener still works? L to R- 30 + years old, 3 years old, 6 months old … planned obsolescence or crappy design (of course they increase in price tag from L-R) by Torvabrocoli
Dunno man I got an oxo which looks similar to the right, and it’s lasted 8 years and looks like new.
regaphysics t1_izuog4w wrote
Reply to In praise of Smartwool's base layers by LifeofSMILEY
Yeah imo darn tough gets way too much praise relative to smart wool. Every single piece I’ve had from smart wool has outlasted my DT. Not that I don’t like DT also. I think it’s just the warranty that everyone is so drawn to lol.
regaphysics t1_izsnzio wrote
Reply to Been looking for a pair of BILF shoes. by Firestar_
There are no bifl shoes. There are somewhat bifl uppers if you want all leather shoes - but you’ll still be replacing the soles and insoles as frequently as you’d replace them with any other shoe - and that is the majority of the cost over time. If you’re interested in the bifl uppers, go to the good year welt sub .
regaphysics t1_izlhxwg wrote
Reply to I know it's a cliché around here, but my Saddleback Leather satchel is over 10 years old and has a quarter million air miles on it, mostly shoved under a seat. It does not lead a sheltered life and it's in fantastic shape. by is_it_on
Saddleback leather is tough stuff. I’ve owned several high end brands and saddleback is the toughest while also being fairly pliable.
regaphysics t1_izboddw wrote
Reply to comment by javaavril in BIFL Request: Side sleeper pillows that will last at least 5 years by [deleted]
Oh my God. No offense you’re just trolling now if you don’t know that down is meant to retain heat and stop convection. They literally molt them in the summer to keep from overheating. Good lord.
https://bedroomsandmore.com/blog/down-vs-wool-bedding-which-is-better/
“Down is not super breathable and loses its loft when wet”
https://www.switchbacktravel.com/down-vs-synthetic-insulation
regaphysics t1_izbmtnp wrote
Reply to comment by javaavril in BIFL Request: Side sleeper pillows that will last at least 5 years by [deleted]
Yes, not a good pillow material as defined by objective criteria. As I said, if you don’t want to use objective criteria then sure, sleep on garbanzo beans because anyone’s opinion goes.
And no, down doesn’t excel at thermoregulation. It traps heat, limits convection, and doesn’t absorb much moisture - which is how most natural materials regulate - in addition to losing its ability to loft when it absorbs moisture. Again, that’s precisely why down is used as an insulator in jackets (and geese). It’s whole purpose is to trap heat.
regaphysics t1_izbhi9m wrote
Reply to comment by javaavril in BIFL Request: Side sleeper pillows that will last at least 5 years by [deleted]
I didn’t state anything as fact other than longevity and resilience. Down absolutely is going to lose resilience at a faster rate than many other materials - that is objectively knowable. Whether it’s still ok for your neck/head that depends. Some people can sleep on anything.
I’m not convincing you you don’t like a thing. I stated down pillows won’t last 15+ years as you said. I stand by that, although I’ll amend that to say it depends how you quantify “last.” They’ll lose resilience faster than several other materials.
(And sleeping cooler than a closed cell foam isn’t a high bar. They’re both very highly insulating. Down is used in coats exactly because it stops convection ( air circulation) so well.).
Edit: btw nothing is 100% goose down. That doesn’t exist. Even 1100 fill power is about 2-3% feathers (and often 2-3% down fibers ie broken down clusters). Check your law tag. Guarantee it doesn’t say 100% down. 750-800 fill power is generally about 85% down - of which it’s often only 80% clusters.)
regaphysics t1_izbbyo7 wrote
Reply to comment by javaavril in BIFL Request: Side sleeper pillows that will last at least 5 years by [deleted]
First off, Frette doesn’t list fill amounts (red flag). I can almost guarantee it’s less than 25 ounces, though. Second, i have used a feathered friends pillow and comforter in the past. They are higher quality than Frette (85% down is unimpressive). If yours weighs a lot, it’s because it’s got a ton of feathers instead of down in it. Like I said, I subbed it out for the Coop pillow and it’s better. Third, the notion that a material quite literally designed by nature for the sole purpose of retaining warmth is “cooling” is a fitting way to end the conversation because you have no idea what you’re talking about and clearly don’t want to learn.
regaphysics t1_izb5jgt wrote
Reply to comment by javaavril in BIFL Request: Side sleeper pillows that will last at least 5 years by [deleted]
I mean, I have no reason to dislike the company other than being overpriced for what it is. A down pillow is nothing special - a little over a pound of down put into a cotton case. If I was going to get a pricey high quality down good, I’d get feathered friends. They actually use higher quality down than Frette, plus it’s cheaper.
But like I said, I wouldn’t get either of them. Down is good for one application: light weight insulation items in dry environments.
regaphysics t1_j5p42qu wrote
Reply to The most comfortable footwear? by _SGP_
No foot wear is bifl, and that’s double true for cushioned comfortable footwear.
Hoka is known for being very cushioned, but yeah it’s the standard 300 miles or so.