resdaz

resdaz t1_izxbntp wrote

Just human behaviour imo. The same way most people would probably prefer to have a human doctor to converse with when they are at deaths door as opposed to chatting to a AI.

Some may call it irrational but we are at the end of the day monkeys. There are instinctual parts deep within our psyche that both crave and need human interaction, especially when they are in distress. Think that is very hard to fake.

1

resdaz t1_izwynjj wrote

The day an AI could fool me in real life I would be absolutely amazed. Over a screen? Maybe.

In actual real life, as a robot thing? I would be absolutely amazed. If there is one thing humans are reeeeaaally good at it is telling when something is "off" with a human like face.

−5

resdaz t1_izwplcf wrote

Yeah I will still listen to music. My argument is more, if the effort required to create a piece of art, whether it be music, books etc, is equal to zero. Then what is the artistic value of it? The world would be absolutely swamped by music, like every possible permutation of music will be created. Is the guy who typed in the prompt credited for "making" it? Is the AI?

I quite like song #4148195115ab43, what about you?

0

resdaz t1_izwog6g wrote

Really? You think people would get the same value out of talking to a computer as a human? Pretty sure only a small section of the actual human interaction is the actual words spoken. Is the AI going to fake a human face? Because that would be incredibly difficult.

−11