sagarnola89

sagarnola89 t1_ixzyitl wrote

That's kind of an unfair comparison. Car dependent areas are safer for pedestrians because there are no pedestrians. But I do agree that in the U.S. in general, not just in the DMV, drivers are entitled assholes. It's cause we have subsidized them for far too long and signaled that they, not pedestrians or cyclists, are what matters. And the second I say that I get accused of being elitist and anti-car. We can't even get a bike lane on Conn Ave without entitled drivers complaining.

6

sagarnola89 t1_ir79rnd wrote

I've done dozens of weekend trips by bus and train. Amtrak goes all over in both directions (Philly. Baltimore, NYC, Wilmington, Richmond, Williamsburg, Charlottesville, Virginia Beach, Harpers Ferry, etc). Flix Bus and Megabus are also good options and I've met some really interesting international travelers, especially on the Flix Bus. Annapolis is $5 every day on the Flix Bus. VA Breeze gets you to tons of Virginia towns (Lexington, Blacksburg, Roanoke, etc) and runs every day. Lots of options!

2

sagarnola89 t1_ir73cih wrote

Reply to comment by BoozAlien in Train to Ashburn! by albinotuba

Honestly,, I lived in London for a year, which obviously has a great transit system. The DC Metro is by and large much cleaner and nicer, and in the summer the lack of AC on the London Tube can be brutal. But, that didn't stop wealthy Londoners from gladly taking the Tube. I still maintain you can't disconnect public transit issues in the US from cultural and racial factors.

7

sagarnola89 t1_ir6ho31 wrote

Reply to comment by AfghanHokie in Train to Ashburn! by albinotuba

I don't disagree with you. My dream is to transform the U.S. into a transit friendly country like most of the rest of the developed. Sadly, it's not the reality currently. DC transit is still light years ahead of most American cities (the fact that I can live a high quality life without a car would be impossible in 90% of American cities).

2

sagarnola89 t1_ir6ghrl wrote

Reply to comment by Aonswitch in Train to Ashburn! by albinotuba

Its unfair because we all know the politics when it comes to government funding of public services (unfortunately) is completely different in the U.S. than it is in Western Europe.

And it's cultural. In the U.S. taking public transit is considered something "poor people" do. I don't own a car and only take public transit, and most of my friends and family are absolutely flabbergasted that I don't buy a car and drive. Or when I suggest we take the metro instead of an Uber. In Western Europe, a man in a suit on his way to the opera would take public transit, no problem.

10

sagarnola89 t1_ir6g6e7 wrote

Reply to comment by well-that-was-fast in Train to Ashburn! by albinotuba

Agree wholeheartedly except I'd amend this to say outside of the Beltway. Stations outside of DC but within DC (Arlington, Alexandria, Bethesda, Silver Spring, College Park , etc) usually aren't on suburban parking lots.

7

sagarnola89 t1_ir6fbg1 wrote

Reply to comment by AfghanHokie in Train to Ashburn! by albinotuba

Well primarily because one of our two major parties is against funding public transit and would rather fund new roads and interstates.

But additionally, I'll defend the Metro a bit. Ashburn is 35 miles from Washington DC. Trains to Ashburn are much more analogous to commuter rails, not rapid transit. Expecting a train from 35 miles away every 4 min is simply unrealistic and not done even in Western Europe.

5