somegridplayer
somegridplayer t1_ix7l408 wrote
Reply to comment by wittgensteins-boat in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
In the case of my town, the location was absolutely perfect for my part of the town. The only catch was a massive douchebag across the street trying to sell their abomination multi million dollar home. So they took up the reign of "towers cause cancer! it'll fall down and set the day care not actually near where it would fall on fire and kill your children!" and shit like that.
A shitty website and a couple street fairs later and lots of mailers, AT&T noped out after listening to their bullshit at a town meeting about it and decided to put it elsewhere, which did not improve our neighborhood's reception at all.
And nobody still wants to buy the douchebag's house.
somegridplayer t1_ix7jtu5 wrote
Reply to comment by wittgensteins-boat in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Federal law allows local governments to deny construction permits for cell towers, however, such denial must be based on a reasoned approach; otherwise the FCC is authorized to preempt the local decision and grant the permit. The 1996 Telecommunications Act preserves local government zoning authority as it relates to cell tower siting, but it provides three key protections for firms seeking to erect a tower:
Local ordinances may not “unreasonably” discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services. Tower siting policies must not favor one company, or one technology, over another;
Local government may not impose a blanket prohibition against the placement of telecommunications towers; and
Local ordinances may not impose more stringent “environmental effects” limits on radio frequency emissions than those adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Stolen from... I just closed the tab. Anyhow, in some cases the carriers will just throw up their hands and say "fuck, we'll put it somewhere else, enjoy your shitty service" if the locals are piss babies.
somegridplayer t1_ix52d2t wrote
Reply to comment by BombShady12 in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Those regulations existed before the fat orange turd and didn't stop drilling. Go back to fapping in conservative and pretending you know anything about oil.
Also you're too daft to know oil supply isn't the issue, it's cracking prices are still through the roof. Again, having nothing to do with regulation but the fact that demand was so low during the pandemic that they spun down the plants, and now that prices are skyrocketed and they're making money hand over fist, there's no reason to bring them back online.
somegridplayer t1_ix3equb wrote
Reply to comment by Creepy-Ad2944 in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Do you know why you have -100 karma? Because you post lies like this.
somegridplayer t1_ix3ehc0 wrote
Reply to comment by BombShady12 in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Jesus fuck stop making shit up. All the companies have mountains of permits to drill. They're not using them. And keep screeching about Keystone. Gas prices would be even higher if it went through.
somegridplayer t1_ix3e9hg wrote
Reply to comment by saltthefries in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
> I'd be surprised if a nuclear power site could be agreed upon in less than a decade
It won't ever happen. You can't even build a fucking cell tower without some asshole claiming it'll give their children cancer and fall down and set your entire town on fire.
somegridplayer t1_ix3e1ur wrote
Reply to comment by Quirky_Butterfly_946 in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
It wasn't environmentalists that shut down Pilgrim, it was Entergy citing economic reasons. They could have easily spun it down but they're not in the business of keeping assets around it seems. They pick up plants at pennies on the dollar run them for a few years, then sell them off to decommissioning companies, amusingly enough, making a profit.
The only thing now that's making life difficult by environmentalists is dumping of water. They think it's going to irradiate their dunks ice coffee and kill their dog.
somegridplayer t1_ix3dpnt wrote
somegridplayer t1_ix3dlfn wrote
Reply to Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Not "maybe nuclear" it should be "definitely nuclear".
somegridplayer t1_iwq7pfr wrote
Yes, it is.
somegridplayer t1_iw4zc98 wrote
Reply to comment by theshysamurai in How do you all feel about Pepe’s pizza? by RecoillessRifle
You absolutely don't know quality pizza if you're crying about grease.
somegridplayer t1_iw4yt98 wrote
Solid coal fired pie. 🤌
Federal Hill is worth a visit.
somegridplayer t1_iw2ey53 wrote
And we're getting hit by the remnants of a November hurricane.
somegridplayer t1_ivt7vks wrote
Reply to comment by ak47workaccnt in Former IBM Littleton site to become mixed-use project, here's what it will include by ak47workaccnt
If I had to guess it's highlighting making that section of road more efficient and bringing in more customers to businesses. Look at the shitfight that is a Market Basket parking lot. Most people don't want to walk across a parking lot to get to a store, nevermind a couple blocks.
somegridplayer t1_ivt3ujh wrote
Reply to comment by amandathelibrarian in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
That's not Shiva, that's Dinesh D'Souza. Just as loopy and stupid as fuck.
somegridplayer t1_ivqe4p0 wrote
Reply to comment by Abrelosojos1311 in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Him and his wife are members of the Dartmouth Republican Town Comittee and are known for being shitbags. It's a boomer club of racists.
They're already crying on Facebook about question 4.
somegridplayer t1_ivpp3h6 wrote
Reply to comment by comment_moderately in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Damn you SorrRRRRRoooOOooOsoossssssss!
somegridplayer t1_ivpl6w0 wrote
Reply to comment by the_other_50_percent in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Ahhh yes, Shiva signs so you know which house contains complete fucking nutbags.
somegridplayer t1_ivpkmq1 wrote
Reply to comment by Abrelosojos1311 in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Took civil rights pamphlets from HIS CHURCH and sent them to Stephen Miller.
Ignored living conditions at both the New Bedford jail and Bristol County.
Highest suicide rates in prison under his watch.
Wanted to send Bristol County prisoners to Texas to build the wall for Trump.
Got New Bedford officers fired for arresting his daughter for obstruction. She was in their face impeding an investigation into a shooting at a local club throwing around "don't you know who my father is? i'll get you fired blahblahblah".
Which of those make him "not a bad guy overall"?
somegridplayer t1_ivpkfzh wrote
Reply to comment by the_other_50_percent in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Man, I haven't heard any stupid Shiva takes this entire cycle. I'm kind of disappointed.
somegridplayer t1_ivpgesv wrote
Reply to comment by GrimmRetails in Longtime Mass. county sheriff, Trump ally loses office in tight race by Purplish_Peenk
Instead he'll just punish some prisoners at bristol county before he gets kicked out.
somegridplayer t1_ivp3qva wrote
Literally the only argument FOR it was "Wines & More is bad!".
somegridplayer t1_ivp2wv6 wrote
Shockingly he conceded without screaming about voter fraud.
somegridplayer t1_ivlsbj3 wrote
Reply to comment by ADarwinAward in Who are you voting for? by aheksow
They can enjoy sucking and move to NH.
somegridplayer t1_ix7oxae wrote
Reply to comment by wittgensteins-boat in Higher energy prices are a call for more renewables and maybe nuclear, not more pipelines by TeacherGuy1980
Same people are screeching about that too.