It's not scalable as a carbon neutral practice

Yeah I wasn't arguing with you. Just pointing it out for others that this isn't some simple solution we've overlooked. Absolutely agree that if it is an option it's better than fossil fuels.

Unfortunately that's only true if all of the wood comes from trees that fall naturally or felled as part of forest maintenance, and even if that's true on your local scale, it's certainly not scalable.

Very selfish

You must have missed the part about the price maxing out at $5

>the ever-increasing size of the American pickup truck.

Technically what is presented is for Ford pickups not all American pickups though I'm sure the trends still line up

The same way forcing religion is bad but allowing people to practice their own faiths is not bad

Define "normal"

They said the US was consciously and legally headed toward segregation. The "evidence" they presented doesn't support that when considered in the context of what those universities are actually doing. And even if it did, it doesn't support anything about moving legally towards segregation.

Where's the strawman?

The vast majority of those they referred to have additional, optional graduation events for smaller communities in addition to the main ceremony. This is not ethnic segregation like what that the US enforced for the first 200 years of our existence.

>they are consciously and legally moving towards segregation and all that, its wild.

That would be wild if it were actually true

I don't see how it says that. The "not voting for Putin" category also includes people that didn't vote at all so it's hard to draw any conclusions from this.

I don't think it's click-bait. I haven't seen clickbaity stuff from them before. Plenty of stuff that I thought others realized, but it's important not to assume that our understanding is what everyone else's understanding or level of knowledge is.

>So, is it all a hyped way to look into “granular” data? Why is McKinsey focusing on something so obvious?

Obvious? Most reporting on life expectancy is done by country, so while it may be obvious to you, McKinsey is pointing out why it's important to account for variations at the microregion level and not just generalize at the country level.

I would chop my dick off if my vehicle got under 10mpg. Thoughts and prayers.

Interesting, though Students/Teacher is generally the metric used which would have also probably made this easier to read

They have 17 wins

No worries! It was humorous and still clear what you actually meant.

Oh come on bro you gotta be l33t /s

So this shows, by country, how popular the search phrase "how to track a cellphone" is?

Also does the bottom right graph indicate that in 2021 it was 100% popular, i.e. literally everyone searched for it?

>„Das gute Bier“ (The good bear)

I know it's a typo but someone should definitely make a beer called The Good Bear

>Note: sincerely, i was not able to understand at sources if the number of views are of the last year or of the total life of the channel

According to the FAQ, they keep up to 3 years of data for channels

Excellent rebuttal

Creating a nuclear disaster in another country is the same as dropping a nuclear bomb. Considering Russia has plenty of them, not having nuclear energy doesn't prevent this type of disaster but certainly hamstrings your ability to produce clean energy.

Every other source of power generation can be neutralized as well