suppaboy228
suppaboy228 t1_iuh3o6a wrote
Reply to comment by OnePunchedMan in hd206🤮🤮(My 3rd post for today) by cum-oishi
They are made much better. Sturdy af.
But koss have cool sound that I was into in my early teens.
suppaboy228 t1_is6evz9 wrote
Reply to comment by Dougmw1337 in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
As it was discussed, monitoring means being able to hear yourself when recording the performance.
Monitoring headphones should not be flat at all. Ones of the best monitoring headphones are 770's and m50x's.
Their spikes are intentional to make the singer record the vocals so that sibilants occur less and for better upper detail retrieval. Narrow soundstage also helps with that.
I don't know if it was designed with that in mind, but we use them for that specific reason as well as many other recording engineers.
And yes, no one is seriously mixing with those.
suppaboy228 t1_irzxzp8 wrote
Reply to comment by icantfindfree in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
This is not monitoring.
It would be monitoring if you were to play electronic drums through those earbuds.
Monitoring is being able to hear what the recording equipment is "hearing".
suppaboy228 t1_irzw2lx wrote
Reply to comment by rodaphilia in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
Wireless pack isn't bluetooth. It's radio.
Attaching a bluetooth transmitter to a radio receiver doesn't seem practical for me considering the latency and quality issues
suppaboy228 t1_iry787l wrote
Reply to comment by AshravenPB in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
This is the wrong tool for the wrong job.
As my grandpa said, you can hit the nail with a microscope. But if you can, it doesn't mean you should.
suppaboy228 t1_irxwjhv wrote
Reply to comment by Oscillus in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
There's more to that than just hearing your voice.
I'm talking about listening to stuff that's being recorded or performed.
For example, you are tracking vocals and you are too forward and the proximity effect is giving you too much lower frequencies. You won't hear that with transparency mode.
Or you are tracking the guitar and need it to have an instant response (up to 10 ms latency is fine). You won't be able to play to the click if the latency is too big.
Hope you get my point.
suppaboy228 t1_irxuvhr wrote
Reply to comment by WatchAndEatPopcorn in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
For me, the last border is them being wired.
If the earbuds are wired and are of higher quality, they can be called iem in my book.
As long as they're wireless, they're tws buds.
suppaboy228 t1_irxsnfr wrote
Reply to comment by WatchAndEatPopcorn in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
Monitoring means being able to hear yourself through the recording/live performance equipment. That's not the case with wireless headphones of any sort as of now.
The first issue is latency, especially on instruments
Then there's quality.
And finally, you can't connect bluetooth headphones to the interface/radio system with no additional gear which can be an issue
suppaboy228 t1_irxqz7b wrote
Reply to comment by HongKong_Bussy_Lmao in IEM’s just hit different by Cameri-
They're IE, but not M.
suppaboy228 t1_iui944t wrote
Reply to comment by VijeyKumar in When you bought an audiophile headphone for the first time but it doesn't sound that good by GLikesSteak
What does it even mean?