t0slink
t0slink t1_jdlhje0 wrote
t0slink t1_jdlhf3s wrote
Reply to comment by meregizzardavowal in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
I wish you were right, but people are calling for investment in AGI to cease altogether:
> There is no way for humans to adapt for alien intelligence. The idea of developing general AI is insanely horrifying from the beginning.
One of the parent comments.
Such absolutist comments leave no room whatsoever for venturing into AGI.
t0slink t1_jdkufvf wrote
Reply to comment by sweatierorc in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
> AI has gotten really good, but let’s not get carried away.
People were saying the same thing five years ago about the generative AI developments we've seen this year.
t0slink t1_jdkq5c1 wrote
Reply to comment by 3deal in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
Nah, full speed ahead please. With enough development, a cure for cancer, aging, and all manner of devastating human ailments could happen in this decade.
It is senseless to cut off a pathway that could literally save and improve tens of billions of lives over the next few decades because you're scared it can't be done correctly.
t0slink t1_jdasig1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Job listing platform Indeed lays off 2,200 employees by marketrent
You have never run or worked for an online platform with hundreds of millions of users, and it shows.
Just because you can use these websites for free does not mean they are cheap to run, in money or in manpower.
t0slink t1_jc3qqjg wrote
Reply to comment by mega153 in The UK is banning TikTok on government devices — joining the US, Canada, and the EU — despite a charm offensive dubbed 'Project Clover,' report says by chrisdh79
Using a blacklist as opposed to a whitelist is absurd.
Unsurprised that government cybersecurity is complete shit given that no government pays even a fifth of what tech pays for the same security role.
t0slink t1_jbaxn9k wrote
Reply to comment by dungone in Meta's 'year of efficiency' continues, thousands more expected to be laid off by chrisdh79
Facebook is a social media platform just like Reddit. Reddit doesn't stop you from posting misinformation - why should Facebook?
Solve the misinformation problem at the source.
t0slink t1_jb4bcgv wrote
Reply to comment by PerfectPercentage69 in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Whether it's publicly traded or not is irrelevant. US businesses can be banned from doing business with TikTok/ByteDance and thus forced to delist the app from app stores.
This is what happened to Huawei and ZTE, and it's why Huawei phones can't use Google Play Services.
t0slink t1_jb4alc0 wrote
Reply to comment by PerfectPercentage69 in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
> Do you think that a Chinese company would respect any privacy law that the US government passes?
By definition, the company would have to follow the law or it would simply be delisted. The US is no stranger to delisting foreign companies for illegal activity.
It is also easy to verify whether these companies are following the law, at least with regards to CCPA or GDPR.
t0slink t1_jb49q5y wrote
Reply to comment by PerfectPercentage69 in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
There is no moral government snooping on users, whether from China or the NSA. This wouldn't have to be a choice if people in this country actually cared to defend their rights in court.
t0slink t1_jb48vpu wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
And you have children. Yikes. Reproducing with those critical thinking skills? Bit of a mistake, don't ya think?
t0slink t1_jb47gb0 wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Ah yes, karma, the greatest measure of knowledge on the internet. Who needs to support claims and cite sources when you have karma?
t0slink t1_jb472n8 wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Never understood why people like you simply can't admit when they're wrong and they can't support their claims. The world would be a better place if people like you didn't take being wrong as an attack on your identity.
t0slink t1_jb46us1 wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Are you seriously using karma to defend your claim?
t0slink t1_jb46f72 wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
"Please support your claim with sources."
"NOooo you're part of a DISINFORMATION campaign!!!!11"
- literally you.
t0slink t1_jb469ux wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
As pointed out, even your "mainstream articles" literally don't support your claim anywhere in them.
When asked for evidence to support the very simple claim that "G/FB sell your data," you have come up with none whatsoever.
If it's such a foregone and obvious conclusion, surely you must have plenty of sources. Please do share them. You'd certainly be able to sue for a handsome amount if you could actually prove it.
t0slink t1_jb44n7l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
I am a cybersecurity engineer, and your claims are completely wrong. Most of your claims aren't even possible on any modern smartphone.
> They record you in your home talking through Alexa and Google Home
They explicitly need a warrant to this. A warrant from a farce of a secret court with no oversight, but it's misleading to say they do this to everyone.
> 1st when you agree to use the app you give them 100% control over your device.
Now the bullshittery begins. Absolutely not the case.
> they can take all your pics, videos anything on your phone
Not true at all. You explicitly have to let it.
> They can turn on your camera and mic whenever they want to record.
Ditto. Not possible unless you explitly give it permission.
> the Chinese govt can spy on you at your job. They can record you talking and take video.
Lmao fuck no, this simply isn't possible. Please learn how modern smartphone OSes work.
You have some valid points about government spying. But then you go completely off-the-rails into fantasy land when it comes to imagining what TikTok can do. Android and iOS simply are not dumb enough to allow any app to take control of your phone like you suggest.
Please stop using your sales position to try to convince people you know what you're talking about. You don't. And that's okay - I'm sure you were a great salesperson, but please don't spread fear, unrest, and despair about stuff you don't understand.
t0slink t1_jb4436s wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Fog Reveal's data is purchased from data brokers. However, neither Facebook nor Google sell to data brokers. In fact, they don't sell your data to any third parties.
However these data brokers are getting your device ID, it's not through FB/G.
You still haven't provided any source that shows that FB/G sell your data.
t0slink t1_jb41xgk wrote
Reply to comment by atwegotsidetrekked in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Apparently you can't read. Literally nowhere does it say that FB/G sell to data brokers like Neustar.
t0slink t1_jb3z5dc wrote
Reply to comment by Curious_Technician85 in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
TikTok also shares with the NSA. This was the whole point of moving the app to Oracle datacenters with tight access control and connection auditing. Oracle closely cooperates with the NSA. So yes, the NSA effectively has unfettered access to TikTok.
I suspect this is less of a national security issue at this point and more of an attempt to force a sale of TikTok to a US entity, strengthening our position in adtech. Alternatively, this is an attempt to kill TikTok entirely, accomplishing the same strengthening of our own adtech industry.
t0slink t1_jb3yu9o wrote
Reply to comment by Kitchen-Award-3845 in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
Please do some basic research. Cambridge Analytica was effectively an exploit.
A researcher working for a Russian-sponsored thinktank found ways to extract much more data from the social graph API than Facebook ever intended for any developers to be able to retrieve.
t0slink t1_jb3xx12 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in New Bill Could Ban TikTok, Other Foreign Technology Products in US Over Data Collection Concerns by donnygel
No, your comment is false.
Google and Facebook don't sell your data, this is a misinformed Reddit meme. Your data is literally their secret sauce, it's the most valuable thing these companies have.
These companies sell ads using your data. They keep your data itself close to their chest, because it is what generates ongoing revenue for them. They are not data brokers at all, and they wouldn't do something so stupid as selling their most valuable asset to data brokers.
FB/G also don't sell data to the NSA, rather they are forced to implement backdoors (PRISM) with gag orders (NSLs). Sometimes the NSA gives them token compensation for the engineering effort, but it's not obligated to. The NSA also doesn't really need their compliance to begin with, to get into their systems.
Source: am a security engineer that has worked for most of Big Tech at this point.
t0slink t1_jaa7hsp wrote
Reply to comment by iamComfortablyDone in Facebook and Instagram will help prevent the spread of teens' intimate photos by goki7
> peddles videos of animal cruelty, sexual assault, torture and killing?
You realize Reddit has all of that content openly, yeah?
This isn't "skirting" anything, it's a legitimately useful tool for teens.
t0slink t1_j9s6fau wrote
Reply to EU seeks input on making tech companies pay for ISPs’ network upgrades by OutlandishnessOk2452
The EU Commission needs to stop meddling with shit it doesn't understand.
t0slink t1_jdubvv8 wrote
Reply to comment by thejontorrweno in Hackers on Edge as FBI Reportedly Gains Access to BreachForums Database by Wagamaga
I think BreachForums and many sites like it, in their infinite wisdom, actually ban access from VPNs and Tor.