uona1

uona1 t1_j6u72s4 wrote

What I dont understand is why these figures are even being given at all. Im not going to study the numbers and everything in depth so ill just assume that somehow someway 1 billion = 42,000 asylum seekers.

What makes people think it will stop at 42,000? You literally have hundreds of thousands more at the border waiting to apply for asylum.

If you budget based on your needs now then of course your going to run out of money.

15

uona1 t1_j6gf8ng wrote

I'm probably going to say something politically incorrect here but sometimes I feel we classify too many things as mental health issues and then use that as an excuse as to why we fail. I feel like if we pulled this shit in china Japan or Korea you would just be laughed out of a job. Not that there's never any mental health issues it just seems like everything including laziness is a mental health issue nowadays.

Like even in the us some of the things we call a mental health issue now would just get you a butt whooping from your dad a generation ago.

1

uona1 t1_j5zzi2c wrote

Ive been told by study after study that migrants are a net positive to the economy. No distinction was made between income level or any other factors so I can only assume the economists who did it did not think they were relevant. Therefore NYC should be happy to take all the migrants as they are a net positive to the economy.

4