user4517proton
user4517proton t1_j94hjdy wrote
Reply to "Starlink is far crazier than most people realize. Feels almost inevitable when I look at this" by maxtility
There goes ground based astronomy.
user4517proton t1_j8h37p4 wrote
Reply to What if AI companies are using our prompts to create low-resolution models of our entire identities? by roiseeker
Facebook, Twitter, and Google have been doing that for years. It is true that with AI assistance they can do more since their base of knowledge is much larger.
user4517proton t1_j8h2q94 wrote
Reply to Meta's chief business officer is leaving after 13 years amid the company ramping up its focus on 'efficiency' by luxisa
Facebook made a big mistake on shifting to the metaverse. All the focus is on AI co-pilots in multiple areas, and they are faking animations of Zukkerturd jumping in a cartoon. Personally, I hope goes the of AOL.
user4517proton t1_j8fzs8m wrote
Reciting what has happen as if you predicted it along with your future predictions has no link and no value.
user4517proton t1_j7jda78 wrote
Reply to comment by st8ic in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
I'm not surprised. Honestly, Google is caught with their pants down on AI integration. They have focused on backend systems to make their ad revenue more profitable. What Microsoft is doing is adding value to the end user. That is a major shift in people's focus on what AI means to everyone, not just Google.
Microsoft is taking a very visible lead in AI for the masses by integrating ChatGPT with Bing, Microsoft 365, development tools, etc. If ChatGPT provides anything near the level of benefit that Co-Pilot does for developers Google has a very valid concern.
I think Microsoft's approach, focusing on the end user value, will make this event be pivotable for how AI is used. Also keep in mind Microsoft is also releasing the biochat GPT, and I suspect there will be a number of targeted releases in the next weeks or months.
A brave new world...
user4517proton t1_j68skoz wrote
It really is the first collaborate AI system open to the masses. I find myself going back to it to ask a question to make sure I got the right idea or even write a sample code or even wording to help me in my efforts.
With targeted GPTs like networks for things like biomedical, which Microsoft just announced, I think we're looking at the new era of collaborate AI resulting in greater speed and quality of work.
The one that will be really helpful is a GPT like frontend that makes GPT more like Javius in Ironman. I don't expect to create a new element, but it would be great to interact with throughout the day.
user4517proton t1_j67o10f wrote
I doubt OpenAI could have continued on donations given the large costs for the networks they need for GPT 4 and beyond. I think Microsoft has done good to allow as much freedom for OpenAI while gaining benefits from the money they provide.
The real kicker will be if OpenAI and Microsoft can topple Google, something that is much needed these days.
user4517proton t1_j4pioxv wrote
I don't believe either statement. Unless you are forcing countries to reduce energy consumption use of fossil fuels will increase and renewables are still marginal.
user4517proton t1_iu7z8tq wrote
Reply to E.U. plans for only electric new vehicles by 2035 ‘without precedent’ by do_you_even_ship_bro
good luck with that. I'll enjoy watching the train wreck from here.
user4517proton t1_irujoz5 wrote
Reply to The emerging climate tech sector will enjoy an 8.8 % growth rate over the next five years: tech companies that remove/reduce CO₂ emissions are “poised for strong continued growth,” reaching an expected value of $1.4tn by 2027 by climeworks
Soley because of Federal funds not innovation, just like Obamas waist of $120B in his term.
user4517proton t1_ircm8j9 wrote
I'm sorry but the Whitehouse and artificial intelligence should not be used in the same sentence. There are just too many ways to go with that.
user4517proton t1_j94k3px wrote
Reply to Do you think the military has a souped-up version of chatGPT or are they scrambling to invent one? by Timely_Hedgehog
Language models like GPT are useful for analyzing the execution of commands. Most command structures in military communication would benefit from analysis to determine if someone is straying from command or moving toward violation of principles. The following published paper is a good example: Ethics, Rules of Engagement, and AI: Neural Narrative Mapping Using Large Transformer Language Models.
I think use of language models will be very beneficial to DOD agencies like NSA, but there is nothing to indicate what they have at this point.