versaceblues
versaceblues OP t1_izdgolk wrote
Reply to comment by CriticalTemperature1 in [D] If you had to pick 10-20 significant papers that summarize the research trajectory of AI from the past 100 years what would they be by versaceblues
>Is it worth even reading old papers? These are meant to communicate with researchers at the time the paper was published so its probably more efficient to learn these concepts and techniques from AI textbooks and blogs
Im just interested from a historical perspective.
versaceblues OP t1_izb7hn0 wrote
Reply to comment by RageA333 in [D] If you had to pick 10-20 significant papers that summarize the research trajectory of AI from the past 100 years what would they be by versaceblues
I was interested also in the Lineage of Thought that lead to where AI currently is.
versaceblues OP t1_izad2r2 wrote
Reply to comment by AbsoluteYes in [D] If you had to pick 10-20 significant papers that summarize the research trajectory of AI from the past 100 years what would they be by versaceblues
no im not in college im just interested.
versaceblues OP t1_iz8mep7 wrote
Reply to comment by huberloss in [D] If you had to pick 10-20 significant papers that summarize the research trajectory of AI from the past 100 years what would they be by versaceblues
interesting I asked gpt the questions as well... it gave me a slightly different set
versaceblues t1_j0aa5n2 wrote
Reply to comment by SnowyNW in [R] Talking About Large Language Models - Murray Shanahan 2022 by Singularian2501
It seems like every argument against it is.
“Oh but it’s just doing statistical filtertring of patterns it’s been trained on. Which is different from the human brain”
But with no clear explanation of how the human brain is different, aside from “oh it’s more complex and does other things that humans do”