That's interesting because I have two wireless mouse. One of them requires two AA batteries and the other one requires one AA battery.

So if one mouse can work on 1.5 volt why can't the other one, given its basically the same product.

Yes. It used to be that the bottle caps were of a different type of plastic and so couldn't be recycled together, at least not easily. And people learnt that, so they used to remove the bottle caps.

But they've gone over to using the same type of plastic in the caps as they do in the bottles, so they can all be recycled together, but getting that new idea through to people is a bit difficult, so it's easier to just tie the bottle cap to the bottle to reinforce the idea that they should now stay together.

I've only seen it done on the big 1 litre bottles, not the small individual ones you get for lunch.

Oh no they don't attempt, they just throw it. They are the same people who burn the plastic in bus shelters so you can't read the timetable.

They need to be separated from the plastic that makes up the bottles, but that can be done at the recycling plant. They just don't want to do the extra step. But that's on them.

I hope you then throw it in the local river. I believe that is the approved method of disposal.

Or you can go for maximum twatage and thow it at a bin, miss, and then just leave it there.

But it wasn't 1000 pounds at that point.

The title makes it seem like a 1000 pound asteroid hit the ground but it didn't.

Are yes, the American medium corgi

So it didn't in fact, in anynway, hit Texas. Which I suppose explains the complete lack of a giant crater which I found suspicious.

There is bad science reporting and then there is straight up lying.

Perhaps they are special low-density baby elephant?

I'm sorry but I need my measurements represented as percentages of a giraffe.

I think the idea is that there will be, but not currently because they're still testing it.

Although it is hard to understand what they're doing because they're not very clear themselves. The idea seems to be that chatGPT will remain free, possibly with some improvements in the future, and then a paid API will be released for people to train their own version of the AI on their own datasets. That paid API is what you're after, but it doesn't exist yet.

What would really be useful is if it could take in files as prompts. For example I can feed it an Excel spreadsheet and then it could write blurb outlining more or less what the spreadsheet says. Writing up reports on spreadsheet is a massively boring task, no one likes it and if it could just be automated that would be fantastic. I'm sure chatGPT is clever enough to do it but it's inability to take in files means it can't. What is not clear is if the API would allow me/someone else to build in that functionality.

>Two philosophy professors told Insider they've already caught students trying to pass off AI-generated content as their own.

Utter chaos, and yet they could only find two people to talk to.

Also using an AI to cheat a philosophy assignment has to be the dumbest thing ever. It's philosophy, you basically can't be wrong.

The sub has basically no standards. If it's even tangentially related to technology it'll be posted here.

There is real value and ground-based astronomy. Not least of all if we don't have the bandwidth for everyone to use JSWT and Hubble.

In general you are right if it's a choice between this and internet infrastructure it isn't even a competition. Obviously astronomers are going to feel different, and this article is written from their perspective.

Like Sunderland but bigger and with more Greggs

It's god awful compression. Sure, the input probably wasn't that good but I am pretty sure it's the compression algorithm that's dropping frames.

It was convicted of being a Nazi though. Though I'm unclear if it was that or the protest that was the problem.

Suppressing right wing nationalists isn't a great idea anyway, although tempting, because it lend legitimacy to their victim complex.

That's not how the US system works.

Why shouldn't they be able to ban apps, it's their devices?

Why is this news? We've never been allowed to put personal social media apps on our company phones why would the government be any different?

This is like saying Pokémon Go is banned on government devices, yeah I'm sure it is.

I honestly can't remember much about it. I'm positive there hasn't been enough time for 3 years to have passed.

Unless they can change the laws of physics I don't see how they going to get the energy density of hydrogen they need it for it to power a plane.

Not without taking up virtually all the space in the aircraft with fuel tanks.

Reading into it. It sounds like they are super incompetent. Even if there is no malicious intent it's still blatant violation of GDPR and whatever the American equivalent is.

Depends on how it's implemented, it may use different ports for different things.

If so, you could just close any port that it uses for streaming data. If the data is streamed via UDP it probably does use a different port than it does for updates, but you would have to look into it find out exactly what it uses.