xombie25
xombie25 OP t1_j1wwl6i wrote
Reply to comment by Tom__mm in Are exothermic chemical reactions a possible avenue for energy? Or is this done regularly today already? by xombie25
That checks out
xombie25 OP t1_j1wtu9e wrote
Reply to Are exothermic chemical reactions a possible avenue for energy? Or is this done regularly today already? by xombie25
The reaction from limestone with water is exothermic. As an example. Limestone is plentiful, water is plentiful. I guess the point of a chemical reaction is that it eventually we just run out of reactants. And that is not sustainable.
I wonder if there was some kind of recycling loophole you could design for a very low loss energy production cycle. Seems like it should be possible at least somehow.
xombie25 t1_j1smhax wrote
Reply to Is there any real upper limit of technology? by basafish
Yes, functionally, from an engineering perspective there is a finite number of ways that molecules can get together or energies can be applied to said molecules.
Finding new materials or new compounds or manufacturing new compounds is often how we drive technological innovation.
xombie25 OP t1_j1x4x5v wrote
Reply to comment by Electrical-Gold1224 in Are exothermic chemical reactions a possible avenue for energy? Or is this done regularly today already? by xombie25
Yeah! That’s what I’m talking about!