This is what I found. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=ai+created+art+can+not+be+copywritten

Oh wow it can write text! Also style transfer is something I've been wishing for, that will make it much easier to get a style you want. The paint by words feature is cool too.

Now will we ever get to use this or will it fall into obscurity as other projects catch up?

There is an argument that co-pilot outputting open source code without credit or the license breaks the license. It will output stuff from open source projects verbatim (I can't find the link, maybe it was in Twitter? I can't back this up.), so this isn't a case where the code is inspired by the code, it really is the code and has to abide by the license.

One solution without messing with co-pilot training or output is to have a second program look at code being generated to see if it's coming from any of the open source projects on gitbub and let the user know so they can abide by the license.

In the US AI created art can't be covered by copyright so it doesn't matter if you own it, anybody can use it. Expect this to change when Disney uses AI to fully create something and demands copyright law changes.

When all you have is a hammer then everything's a nail. Somebody that knows a lot about 3D printing decided that it will work for everything. I'd like to know how it compares to a factory built house, or a factory built 3D printed house

My cat claims she's never eaten food before but she's still fat. An independent third party needs to calculate total costs, not the company selling it that swear it's cheaper and you just have to believe them.

Houses need to last a very long time. The plumbing system could last 75+ years, the house could last 100+ years if you keep up with maintence. This means switching to a new technology that turns out to not work as advertised can be a disaster.

There used to be a copper water pipe replacement called polybutylene. It was cheaper and easier to install than copper, but it turned out to have a short lifespan with leaks happening early in it's life. You might not be able to get homeowners insurance if you have these pipes requiring them to be replaced. They started being installed in the 70's but it wasn't until the 90's the problem was discovered. That's 20+ years of what was thought to be a proven technology.

So construction companies, the reputable ones at least, don't want to leap into something new only to find out many years later there's some horrible problem that could not be forseen.

Then there's the "we've always done it that way" people. Even when something is proven they refuse to use it because they have always done something a different way. These are also the people that shake hands with danger because they think it's manly to breath in rock dust and get lung cancer. When you are near a construction site and hear a guitar riff that's somebody that doesn't know what they're doing. https://youtu.be/Mmrs9GYkbqg

Solar and wind are cheaper than fossil fuels, so to say clean energy is expensive would mean dirty energy is even more expensive.

It's the kid saying they were just practicing so it doesn't count.

Gamepass appeals to me. It's cheaper than buying games.

Diffusion for language models provides more coherent output according to various studies I've found. I'm surprised nobody's talking about it considering all the hype about diffusion for image generators. I guess it's not as cool as it sounds. The paper doesn't compare it to GPT models which should have told me something.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14217

https://github.com/xiangli1999/diffusion-lm

There's also a new method that's even faster than diffusion.

https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/an-introduction-to-poisson-flow-generative-models/

I hope you have good luck on your text generating endeavors!

NovelAI does it as well and it doesn't really work that well. Many times it completely ignores entries. However both NovelAI and AI Dungeon have a limited output. This study is on generating 2000+ words without human intervention. I made plenty of stories with both NovelAI and AI Dungeon to know that neither stay on topic and quickly go off the rails. It doesn't matter what model is used, they all go off the rails.

6 years and things are worse than ever before. The final thread pulled from the tapestry of life was Harambe's death in whatever year that was.

I knew a kid that loved Crusader Kings, Civilization, Europa Universalis, riding around on donkeys while drunk, and the working class. His name? Andrew Ryan.

Bad code helps it too. The amount of data used to train a model is far more important than the size of the model. Just shove as much unique data in there as possible.

Enjoy this song about mission statements in business. https://youtu.be/GyV_UG60dD4

They just have to see if a person has an active Reddit account for that.

There is no reason to copy the human brain to create AI. There's a lot of extra stuff in there that's not needed. Creativity is being done just fine without copying the brain with stuff like Stable Diffusion. This is yet another "humans are special" article from somebody that can't comprehend humans are not special and the way our brain works is not the only way for intelligence to function.

Given how fast AI can work, once it can create software on it's own without human help we can expect things to move very fast. Think of Copilot but instead of needing a human to hand hold it, you can just tell it what you want and it can code the entire thing from scratch.

We will have to wait for somebody else to do an open source version.

When somebody makes something like Copilot that can write code by itself that's going to be really cool.

It burns my bread that they are always worried about explicit scenes and violence. If they were producers for Django Unchained they would demand all the violence and bad words be removed.

Unless the code is available there's no guarantee it can be replicated. Plenty of people in /r/machinelearning complain about papers that can't be replicated. Sometimes the people writing the paper promise the code and then never provide it and refuse to respond to anybody asking for it.

They mean is there a way for a third party to prove it. They could be cherry picking or just fabricate their results and with no way to reproduce it we wouldn't know.