zgrizz

zgrizz t1_ivrd0nq wrote

Just another way to game the system. It allows people who don't want, in this case, to vote Democrat, but want to support the Democrat that their third-party purchased to get their vote.

CT needs a law saying no candidate may appear on a ballot more than once.

Like most smart states.

−11

zgrizz t1_ivhobt2 wrote

They carved out an exception for themselves in junk call/junk text laws.

I've never understood why they think I would reward then with a vote after they intentionally ignore my Do Not Call list status. Seems pretty ignorant.

46

zgrizz t1_iujl5bw wrote

I think you'd have a hard time convincing the larger group of people that it is "improving". But it is changing, and that is a constant going back eons. And that change tends to reflect trends popular with youth, although an argument could be made that youth automatically embraces new over old, meaning that the trend tracks in the other direction.

2

zgrizz t1_iszau8r wrote

She argues a politically driven 'maybe', he argues facts.

People who don't vote for facts get what they deserve.

"Hayes, seeking her third term, said Logan, a former state senator, would join a conservative caucus with plans to further curtail women's reproductive rights and threaten Social Security and Medicare. She worked to portray him as someone from outside the district who was ousted from the state legislature after two terms and is now the recipient of millions of dollars in advertising from conservative leaders.

Logan focused on the economy and inflation.

"Connecticut's economy is shrinking under the Biden-Harris administration," Logan said. "Connecticut's personal income growth: worst in the nation. We can do better, but we won't under the current administration.""

−50