There is a major difference between human societies and nature, namely that we have morals and ethics. If you truly believe that might makes right as a fundamental principle, you basically have to throw out most of morality and ethics. You have to believe that slavery was OK, the holocaust was OK, rape and murder are OK, China’s treatment of Uyghur is OK, torture is OK. After all, they are all simply scenarios where someone used their might to do what they wished.

So: does might really make right? Or only when you are on the side of might?

Might makes right!

Seriously, if that is your argument, just make it. The commenter above isn’t making that argument though. They are making the argument that the fact that indigenous nations fought with each other excuses the fact of colonialism.

By this logic a bunch of aliens from another planet would be justified to come in, genocide 90% of all humans, take 99% of the earth’s landmass, and justify it by pointing out that we fought each other before they arrived. Indigenous nations do not need to have been some hippy pacifist ideal in order to have any right to say that what European colonizers did was wrong.

Guessing most of those male Jaimes are pronounced quite a bit differently from the female ones

Every stud, ideally. Any area between two rafters without a baffle is a spot where the insulation can trap warm air and moisture against the underside of the roof decking. If your insulation isn’t deep enough to touch the underside of the decking it’s not as much of a concern.

Ideally you'd put vents into the soffits and use baffles like this: https://www.doityourself.com/stry/installing-attic-insulation-baffles

If you can't or won't put in vents, it's still best to install baffles to ensure that the insulation does not touch the underside of the roof decking.

Translated into English:

Meta says, “We weren’t able to get anyone interested in using our robotic overlord’s pet product on their own time, so we are now counting on managers forcing their white collar office drones to use it.”

Microsoft says: “It can’t make the steaming pile of dogshit that is Teams any worse, so what the hell.”

Even plain wood does produce small amounts of formaldehyde naturally. Natural wood emits less than urea formaldehyde and phenyl formaldehyde glues, it’s true, but still some. Given that this research seems aimed at reducing the formation of formaldehyde in the wood itself, and glues/binders typically already have formaldehyde in them and no chemical process is needed to produce it, I am guessing they really are referring to the naturally occurring formaldehyde that is emitted from the wood itself. Which would not be covering up nasty pressed board but instead increasing air quality even in a no-added-formaldehyde construction.

The article says that for this analysis they needed sufficient detail to give them location, date, and time of day within some margin of error. Guessing older ones don’t have the detail they need, or alternately that this analysis has been done for other time periods but not this one.

Or you know, the kraken is already a super cool mythical creature